- Joined
- Aug 31, 2009
.............
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
That is the point. BECAUSE they are slower clock for clock in this particular calculation (ALU?) it takes a noteably faster clockspeed for AMD to match Intel. Its calculated the same across the chips. 1M Pi digits to calculate are 1M Pi digits to calculate bro. If you have any LINKS that state it calculates different that I can read, I would be more than happy to stand corrected. But AFAIK, its the same. AMD chips are just slower in that CPU function.
See...now THAT I must admit I didnt know. For that generation, you are correct in regards to performance...SuperPi has always been optimized for Intel. Just before the C2D came out Intel could still beat AMD clock for clock in SuperPi.
But that doesn't mean the Intel chip was faster "clock for clock" - it only meant Intel was faster at running SuperPi - period, End of Line
Geez, five years later and still having to explain that ...
aries at what volts are you running you cpu?
My apolgies to aries... sorry!
SuperPi has always been optimized for Intel. Just before the C2D came out Intel could still beat AMD clock for clock in SuperPi.
But that doesn't mean the Intel chip was faster "clock for clock" - it only meant Intel was faster at running SuperPi - period, End of Line
Geez, five years later and still having to explain that ...