- Joined
- Jul 25, 2003
- Location
- Rio de Janeiro
If you have a Dynamic IP, then just turn off your modem and router for a few hours, when you reconnect you should have a new IP .
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
pwnt by pat said:I used to use 2k exclusivly and have never, NEVER, NEVER had a problem with viruses or spyware - patched or unpatched. Just don't go anywhere you aren't supposed to. I use xp now, unpatched. I use no anti-virus, no antispyware. I don't go places where it's required as a safeguard.
What it sounds like is you have "someone" specifically attacking your IP. Call your isp and see what kind of activity is happening on your line.
edit: again, if you go places you shouldn't anyway, you won't have any problems
pwnt by pat said:Maybe not where he went after reinstall but definately what happened before his reformat. You don't just get randomly blasted anymore unless you did something to make yourself a target in the past.
... especially when all you do is plug the cable in and pick up an ip.
pwnt by pat said:That's how I used to run, no firewall, no router, no anti-virus, no patches, and no problems. I don't use windows firewall or sp2. The only reason I switched to xp was because it takes forever to log on to 2k when you have several mapped drives on a server.
While there is no doubt some programs out there randomly scanning machines, it's rediculious to blame 2k for becoming infected the second it picked up an ip.
The most secure system during the experiment was the one running Linspire's Linux. Out of the box, Linspire left only one open port. While it reacted to ping requests by automated attackers sniffing for victims, it experienced the fewest attacks of any of the six machines and was never compromised, since there were no exposed ports (and thus services) to exploit.
The Macintosh machine, on the other hand, was assaulted as often as the Windows XP SP1 box, but never was grabbed by a hacker
Caffinehog said:LOL! I can't get my router to work with my DSL modem. I talked to SBC, found out the problem is this:
In order for my DSL modem to work, it needs to get its IP over the DSL. In order for my router to work, it must assign an IP to the devices connected to it. So no router or no internet. I can upgrade my DSL gateway for $50. (Yeah, right.) I can see why this is the "free" DSL modem that they give out... nobody would BUY it. Words can't express my "love" for SBC, but that's another story entirely.
In any case, I did get everything running, with zonealarm, patches, antivirus, and all, but it wasn't a job for the timid or lazy.
Caffinehog said:LOL! I can't get my router to work with my DSL modem. I talked to SBC, found out the problem is this:
In order for my DSL modem to work, it needs to get its IP over the DSL. In order for my router to work, it must assign an IP to the devices connected to it. So no router or no internet. I can upgrade my DSL gateway for $50. (Yeah, right.) I can see why this is the "free" DSL modem that they give out... nobody would BUY it. Words can't express my "love" for SBC, but that's another story entirely.
In any case, I did get everything running, with zonealarm, patches, antivirus, and all, but it wasn't a job for the timid or lazy.
jajmon said:THIS HAS 'NOTHING' TO DO WITH THIS THREAD - START A NEW THREAD. SHEEESH
Kendan said:You do realize this is the thread starter talking about why he is not behind a NAT router which relates perfectly to this thread. Now your CAPS is another story all together
jajmon said:THIS HAS 'NOTHING' TO DO WITH THIS THREAD - START A NEW THREAD. SHEEESH
speed bump said:YOu have talent I have never installed a firewall in win2k and have never gotten spyware unless I intentoinally let it get on.
I think you got something else going on or nasty internet stuff ins't interested in me at all.