- Joined
- Sep 25, 2012
- Location
- New Zealand
Hi all,
On Windows 7 I liked how it used the first core of each module of my FX-8120 during 4 threaded gaming as per maximum performance.
Now in Windows 8, with the scheduler upgrades it seems like it uses cores 0-3 during gaming while 4-7 remain parked causing the first 2 modules to be loaded up.
My question is, as I have APM and turbo turned off and it overclocked to ~4ghz, how do I get Windows to spread the games to core 0,2,4,6 for more performance? I seem to have lost a few FPS since I upgraded even with same or newer drivers.
Sorry if I'm confusing, it just seems like the improvements they made are for turbo enabled chips at stock settings to ramp up the first 2 modules. Or has Windows 8 changed so that what it reports as core's 0, 1 ,2 and 3 are actually 0, 2, 4, 6?
On Windows 7 I liked how it used the first core of each module of my FX-8120 during 4 threaded gaming as per maximum performance.
Now in Windows 8, with the scheduler upgrades it seems like it uses cores 0-3 during gaming while 4-7 remain parked causing the first 2 modules to be loaded up.
My question is, as I have APM and turbo turned off and it overclocked to ~4ghz, how do I get Windows to spread the games to core 0,2,4,6 for more performance? I seem to have lost a few FPS since I upgraded even with same or newer drivers.
Sorry if I'm confusing, it just seems like the improvements they made are for turbo enabled chips at stock settings to ramp up the first 2 modules. Or has Windows 8 changed so that what it reports as core's 0, 1 ,2 and 3 are actually 0, 2, 4, 6?