I've been playing around with a BE6-II Ver. 2.0 and a Slot 1 866EB lately. I checked the database and I guess this cCO chip rocks, since it will boot at 160 FSB at 1.85 volts and barely touch 41 C with a Golden Orb.
Problem is, with two sticks ram I have to drop down to 3-3-3, plus it will lock up in 3DMark2001. Maybe its my AGP bus running 106 mhz, heh. The best I can do at 2-2-2 is 150 FSB with two sticks. With one stick I can hit 155 2-2-2 stable in 3D.
I found 1 stick of 128 MB Mushkin Rev. 3.0 will do 160, 2-2-2, but still that lockup in 3DMark2001.
Problem is games like Serious Sam Second Encounter and IL-2 Sturmovik will stutter a bit with 256 MB (especially when you run them at 1600x1200 like I do on my Radeon 8500), so I want to run 512 MB.
I checked Mushkin and Crucial and they don't sell 512 MB ram so I'm stuck with 2 sticks to get 512 MB.
BTW, these are my findings:
1-128 MB Crucial PC-133 CAS 2 will only do 153 2-2-2.
1-128 MB Mushkin Rev. 3.0 will do 155 2-2-2 (will do 160 2-2-2 but won't pass 3DMark2001). This is the old 7.5 ns Infineon.
2-256 MB PowMan memory, 7 ns Infineon (same as current Mushkin Rev. 3.0), will do 150 2-2-2. One stick alone will do 155 2-2-2, but not 160 2-2-2. Two sticks will do 160 3-3-3, but have that lockup in 3dMark2001.
When I say 'do', I mean I can run 3DMark2000, 3dMark2001, the Serious Sam Second Encounter demos, and the IL-2 Sturmovik tracks with no lockups. I would say this is a pretty good indicator of 3D stability. As far as I'm concerned, if it ain't stable in 3D it ain't stable.
I was able to get some of the good Tonicom ram a year ago but it's at my stateside address. When I pick them up in August it will be interesting to see if they will do 160+ 2-2-2 like some people say
'Guess the only other way to go is Athlons and DDR. Some guys are claiming to hit 160+ 2-2-2 with Thunderbirds and Athlons, but I wonder if they are truly stable in 3D.
Problem is, with two sticks ram I have to drop down to 3-3-3, plus it will lock up in 3DMark2001. Maybe its my AGP bus running 106 mhz, heh. The best I can do at 2-2-2 is 150 FSB with two sticks. With one stick I can hit 155 2-2-2 stable in 3D.
I found 1 stick of 128 MB Mushkin Rev. 3.0 will do 160, 2-2-2, but still that lockup in 3DMark2001.
Problem is games like Serious Sam Second Encounter and IL-2 Sturmovik will stutter a bit with 256 MB (especially when you run them at 1600x1200 like I do on my Radeon 8500), so I want to run 512 MB.
I checked Mushkin and Crucial and they don't sell 512 MB ram so I'm stuck with 2 sticks to get 512 MB.
BTW, these are my findings:
1-128 MB Crucial PC-133 CAS 2 will only do 153 2-2-2.
1-128 MB Mushkin Rev. 3.0 will do 155 2-2-2 (will do 160 2-2-2 but won't pass 3DMark2001). This is the old 7.5 ns Infineon.
2-256 MB PowMan memory, 7 ns Infineon (same as current Mushkin Rev. 3.0), will do 150 2-2-2. One stick alone will do 155 2-2-2, but not 160 2-2-2. Two sticks will do 160 3-3-3, but have that lockup in 3dMark2001.
When I say 'do', I mean I can run 3DMark2000, 3dMark2001, the Serious Sam Second Encounter demos, and the IL-2 Sturmovik tracks with no lockups. I would say this is a pretty good indicator of 3D stability. As far as I'm concerned, if it ain't stable in 3D it ain't stable.
I was able to get some of the good Tonicom ram a year ago but it's at my stateside address. When I pick them up in August it will be interesting to see if they will do 160+ 2-2-2 like some people say
'Guess the only other way to go is Athlons and DDR. Some guys are claiming to hit 160+ 2-2-2 with Thunderbirds and Athlons, but I wonder if they are truly stable in 3D.