There is a better chance that it will do better, but nothing is guaranteed. I had 1 low VID Q6600 that ran incredibly hot, but it did run 500FSB easily. I had another low VID Q6600 that OC'd very well, and ran cool. For the most part low VID Q6600's are a good thing!
That's actually pretty typical for 45nm CPUs. It doesn't seem that the VID has any correlation w/ OC potential on 45nm CPUs. Batch number is a better indicator.
You have the same VIDed chip as me and mine does really good. see the sig
i had an Artic cooler freezer pro 7 for a cooler and i could take mine up to 3.4 with that and i think i used 1.32v to get that.
have you tried fsb@ 400 and multi @ 8??
You have the same VIDed chip as me and mine does really good. see the sig
i had an Artic cooler freezer pro 7 for a cooler and i could take mine up to 3.4 with that and i think i used 1.32v to get that.
have you tried fsb@ 400 and multi @ 8??
I also had AF7, but replaced it with Noctua. Not much of an improvement in temps, as i excepted. Tried 3.4GHz couple of times, the voltage was around the number you mentoined (1.32~). But, the temps arent good. I was hitting 70C under full load.
My Q6600 ran at 70-75*C under full load at 3.6GHz. I wouldn't be afraid of the 70's, but I would definitely try to stay below 80*C.
Basically, keeping your distance to Tjmax > 20*C is a good rule of thumb. I like to run the 45nm CPUs a little cooler, but the 65nm CPU's can handle it IMO.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.