c&p from another post from earlier today.
Temps are not as big an issue as the stability. The cores on a tbird or xp are more durable than given credit and amd recommendation for temps are to be no higher than 200f/93c. Now I personally don't like high temps myself but have done high heat tests with an old 1.33 tbird just to see how high I could get the temps before loosing stability.
I tried three different hs before I achieved the max temp I felt comfortable going with for the test. I ended up with a retail hsf from a 1gig tibird with the fan@ 7v. I did not overclock, for obvious reasons, but did raise the core voltage to 1.85v. At full load the cpu temps were between 87-89c. At first I was sweating bullets. But after a few hours at full load, I was felling a bit better.
I maintained this setup for over a month to see if the core was going to die. Playing games, seti@home, benchmarks and anything I could do to keep the cpu rocking at that high temp. The cpu stayed stable the whole time and to this date, the cpu is still working and is still a good overclocking axia core
The moral of my tests was to educate myself about the durability of the core and the myth on how heat can kill your cpu. To me, stability is more important than heat. If you plan on overclocking, do worry about heat but if your overclock is stable, even at or above 60c, you should be fine. One of my seti crunchers is presently at 59c and the up time to date is 10day 14hrs 33min.
r12