- Joined
- Nov 1, 2001
- Location
- New Iberia, LA
OK, after all my troubles and problems and working around them and fixing them in the last thread, I decided to just start this thread over again with the new round of testing. I will do some cutting and pasting of basic parts of my posts from the last thread, as well as the fan data from there too. Anyways, here goes nothing.
After being a long time user of Thermalright products, I finally got tired of having to lap the base of every heatsink I've bought from them in the last 3-4 years because of substandard base finishes. Then, the Prolimatech Megahalems came out and I started seeing very good results from them being posted here without having to resort to lapping the base straight out of the box. So I decided to get myself one and see what the Megahalems is all about. Since I already own a lapped TRUE, it made for a chance to do a comparison on the performance between the two heatsinks too, using the same fans is several different configurations and see how the performance of both compare.
The fans I am using for this comparison are as follows:
Sanyo Denki - San Ace 109R1212H1011 (X 2)
Specs:
Panaflo - M1A/M1BX - Model # FBA12G12M (by Matsu****a Electric) (X2)
Specs
Panaflo - L1BX- Model # FBA12G12L (by NMB-MAT) (X2)
Specs
Scythe - S-Flex SS21G (X 2)
Specs:
Yate Loon High - D12SH-12 (X 2) (bought from PTS)
Specs:
Yate Loon Medium - D12SM-12 (X 2) (1 from PTS, 1 from Jab-tech)
Specs:
Scythe - Gentle Typhoon D1225C12B5AP-15 (by Nidec Servo Corp) (X 2)
Specs:
Noctua NF-P12 - NF-P12-1300 120mm Fan (X1)
Specs:
Scythe Slipstream (medium) - SY1225SL12M (X1)
Specs:
Some notes on the fans:
The test configuration is a system made of various spare parts I had laying around, consisting of:
Antec 1040 style case (Actually a Chieftech clone)
Hiper M1000 psu (O_W review sample I bought from him) - TRUE Rev C and Venomous X tests used Corsair VX450
Gigabyte P35-DS3R mobo used for original TRUE and Megahalems tests - TRUE Rev C tests used Gigabyte P35-DS3L mobo. The Venomous X tests used an Asus P5Q Pro mobo due to yet another Gigabyte board biting the dust on me!
Q6600 overclocked to 3600 with the voltage running between 1.52 to 1.48 at load. I wish I could have gotten a little more voltage, but this Gigabyte board has no load line calibration and absolutely horrid vdroop and vdrop. These voltages were what I saw when I had 1.6v vcore set in bios. Even at this overclock, that works out to a 200 watt heatload according to this page. And for the testing of the Venomous X, I used a P5Q Pro board, which does have load line calibration in bios. I set the vcore at 1.4875 in bios and OCCT shows it as staying right on 1.48v while OCCT is running.
eVGA 7900GTX vid card
2 X 1 gig kit of OCZ PC2-8500 Platinum DDR2 ram
old 20 gig 7200 rpm IDE Maxtor hard drive
Lite on IDE dvd burner
OS: Win7 RC, 32 bit version
I used OCCT version 3.1.0 as the heat source since it will run a one hour test automatically and also gives a graphical result as a series of png files at the end of the run for each core. I then went through the pics and pulled the high and low temps off of each core. I maintained room temps as close as I could to a range between 20.55-21.11 degrees C (69-70 F).
I decided to do this comparison inside a case instead of open air to see what actual performance differences might be seen in something that the normal person would actually use (instead of enthusiasts like us who will run them nekkid ). The case design is an older one that uses 2-80mm fans on the back side for ventilation and while it's not as good as newer cases in this regard it's still not bad, just a little noisy. And I don't have the i/o backplane panel installed around the i/o ports of the mobo so that gives extra room for the push-pull configurations to exhaust air. After running into clearance and crowding problems when trying to get viable numbers off of push-pull setups using the 38 mm thick fans, I decided to mod the exhaust fan area on this case for better ventilation and more room. I did this by removing the 2 internal 80 mm exhaust fans off the back side of the case and then opening the holes up and installing 2 Panaflo 92 X 25 mm M1BX fans externally on the back side of the case. That gives me another inch of room between the back of the case and the fans mounted on the heatsinks, which makes for much better efficiency for the a push-pull config with 38 mm thick fans. And I believe the results I am now showing with the fans in push-pull configuration reflect the better exhaust venting due to this modification. If you are running an older Antec SX 10xx style case (and the clones included), I would highly recommend that you make this relatively simple mod to your case for better airflow.
After being a long time user of Thermalright products, I finally got tired of having to lap the base of every heatsink I've bought from them in the last 3-4 years because of substandard base finishes. Then, the Prolimatech Megahalems came out and I started seeing very good results from them being posted here without having to resort to lapping the base straight out of the box. So I decided to get myself one and see what the Megahalems is all about. Since I already own a lapped TRUE, it made for a chance to do a comparison on the performance between the two heatsinks too, using the same fans is several different configurations and see how the performance of both compare.
The fans I am using for this comparison are as follows:
Sanyo Denki - San Ace 109R1212H1011 (X 2)
Specs:
- Fan Size: 120mm x 120mm x 38mm
- Speed: 2600 RPM
- Airflow: 102.5 CFM
- Noise: 39 dBA
- Static Pressure: 64.7Pa (~6.6mm H2O)
- Bearing: Ball bearing
- Power: 6.24 W
Panaflo - M1A/M1BX - Model # FBA12G12M (by Matsu****a Electric) (X2)
Specs
- Fan Size: 120mm x 120mm x 38mm
- Speed: 2100 RPM
- Airflow: 86.5 CFM
- Noise: 35.5 dBA
- Static Pressure: 47.1Pa (4.80mm H2O)
- Bearing: Hydrowave bearing (essentially the same as the Sony FDB bearing)
Panaflo - L1BX- Model # FBA12G12L (by NMB-MAT) (X2)
Specs
- Fan Size: 120mm x 120mm x 38mm
- Speed: 1700 RPM
- Airflow: 68.9 CFM
- Noise: 30 dBA
- Static Pressure: 32.4Pa (3.30mm H2O)
- Bearing: Hydrowave bearing (essentially the same as the Sony FDB bearing)
- Power: 2.16w W
Scythe - S-Flex SS21G (X 2)
Specs:
- Fan Size: 120mm x 120mm x 25mm
- Speed: 1,900 RPM
- Airflow: 75.0 CFM
- Noise: 35.0 dBA
- Bearing: S-FDB (Fluid Dynamic Bearing by SONY Corporation)
- Power: 2.88 W
Yate Loon High - D12SH-12 (X 2) (bought from PTS)
Specs:
- Fan Size: 120mm x 120mm x 25mm
- Speed: 2200 +/- 10% RPM
- Airflow: 88.0 CFM
- Noise: 40 dBA
- Bearing: Sleeve
- Power: 3.6 W
Yate Loon Medium - D12SM-12 (X 2) (1 from PTS, 1 from Jab-tech)
Specs:
- Fan Size: 120mm x 120mm x 25mm
- Speed: 1650 +/- 10% RPM
- Airflow: 70.5 CFM
- Noise: 33.0 dBA
- Bearing: Sleeve
- Power: 3.6 W
Scythe - Gentle Typhoon D1225C12B5AP-15 (by Nidec Servo Corp) (X 2)
Specs:
- Fan Size: 120mm x 120mm x 25mm
- Speed: 1850 RPM
- Airflow: 58.3 CFM
- Noise: 28 dBA
- Static Pressure: 20Pa (2.06mm H2O)
- Bearing: Double ball bearing
- Power: 4.32 W starting, 1 watt running
Noctua NF-P12 - NF-P12-1300 120mm Fan (X1)
Specs:
- Fan Size: 120mm x 120mm x 25mm
- Speed: 1300 +/- 10% RPM
- Airflow: 54.3 CFM
- Noise: 19.8 dBA
- Bearing: SSO-Bearing
- Power: 1.08 W
Scythe Slipstream (medium) - SY1225SL12M (X1)
Specs:
- Fan Size: 120mm x 120mm x 25mm
- Speed: 1200 RPM
- Airflow: 68.54 CFM
- Noise: 24 dBA
- Bearing: Sleeve
- Power: 3.12 W
Some notes on the fans:
- Specs for the fans were pulled off of the Petra's Tech Shop website, Jab-tech's website, Sidewinder Computer's website and also the manufacturer's websites.
- One Yate Loon Medium fan was bought from PTS early this year by me. The other Yate Loon Medium was donated to me for this test by Jab-tech. I would like to thank Jab-tech for sending me the second Yate loon Medium fan when I was ordering extra fan clips for my Megahelams so I could test with 2 Yate mediums in push-pull. Jab-tech also helped on the price a bit on the TRUE Rev C and Venomous X heatsinks. Thanks John, I really appreciate it!
- Also, I would like to thank Gary at Sidewinder Computers for donating a Panaflo L1BX for this test. I had one already but he donated a brand new one along with the other that I ordered so I could test with 2 brand new Panaflo L1 fans for the push-pull tests. Thanks very much Gary, it is much appreciated!
- I only had 1 Noctua NF-P12 fan and I wasn't going to cough up another $20 to get another for this test, so I subbed in a Scythe SY1225SL12M Slipstream to take the second fan's place in push-pull configs. Previous testing of this fan showed me similar results to the Noctua fan so I think it's a valid substitution for a second NF-P12.
- I have no measuring equipment to test this, but I think the cfm figure is inflated and the noise figure is deflated for the Noctua fan.
- I believe the cfm figure is greatly inflated for the Slipstream.
- Gentle Typhoon - slight high pitched but very smooth sound to them. No perceptible bearing noise and would be very easy to live with in a push-pull config. The highly swept 9 blade impeller configuration really does a good job of cutting down tip noise from the blades.
- Panaflo L1BX - Not as highly pitched as the Gentle Typhoon, but more tip noise. You can hear a slight raspyness to the impeller noise, but the overall sound is both low and smooth. Another fan that wouldn't be hard to get used to. The 7 blade rotor definitely makes more noise, but then this fan also pushes more air than the Gentle Typhoon also, with significantly higher static pressure. No perceptible bearing noise.
- "G" model S-Flex - These are the first of the "G" models I've ever owned and tested and they were actually noisier than I expected. The sound from them is lower pitched than the Gentle Typhoon but much raspier sounding from tip noise. They move much more air than the Gentle Typhoon and it's hard to tell if they move less or more air than the Panaflo L series fans. They are definitely noisier than the Panaflo fans and if you are very sensitive to noise I don't think these would make a good choice for you unless you hook them on a fan controller. No perceptible bearing noise
- The Panaflo M1A sounds much like it's lower speed brother except it's slightly higher pitched due to the faster rpm is spins and it's also louder. These are not fans to use if you have to have absolute silence. I would classify them as in the same loudness class as the Scythe S-Flex G fans (which is actually reflected by the manufacturer's dB ratings they give for them).
- Sanyo Denki fans - Remarkable fans, move a large amount of air for the noise they make. They move more air with a higher static pressure than the Panaflo M1 fans, yet aren't much louder. They are a little higher pitched than the M1 fans, but the tip noise from the impeller isn't any louder. These are not silent fans by any means, but they also aren't screamers that will deafen you either.
- I also want to note that the Gentle Typhoon fans I received are essentially closed corner fans, which needed to be opened up for use with the TRUE wire clips. And all the Yate Loon fans were originally closed corner fans that I opened up with my Dremel tool.
The test configuration is a system made of various spare parts I had laying around, consisting of:
Antec 1040 style case (Actually a Chieftech clone)
Hiper M1000 psu (O_W review sample I bought from him) - TRUE Rev C and Venomous X tests used Corsair VX450
Gigabyte P35-DS3R mobo used for original TRUE and Megahalems tests - TRUE Rev C tests used Gigabyte P35-DS3L mobo. The Venomous X tests used an Asus P5Q Pro mobo due to yet another Gigabyte board biting the dust on me!
Q6600 overclocked to 3600 with the voltage running between 1.52 to 1.48 at load. I wish I could have gotten a little more voltage, but this Gigabyte board has no load line calibration and absolutely horrid vdroop and vdrop. These voltages were what I saw when I had 1.6v vcore set in bios. Even at this overclock, that works out to a 200 watt heatload according to this page. And for the testing of the Venomous X, I used a P5Q Pro board, which does have load line calibration in bios. I set the vcore at 1.4875 in bios and OCCT shows it as staying right on 1.48v while OCCT is running.
eVGA 7900GTX vid card
2 X 1 gig kit of OCZ PC2-8500 Platinum DDR2 ram
old 20 gig 7200 rpm IDE Maxtor hard drive
Lite on IDE dvd burner
OS: Win7 RC, 32 bit version
I used OCCT version 3.1.0 as the heat source since it will run a one hour test automatically and also gives a graphical result as a series of png files at the end of the run for each core. I then went through the pics and pulled the high and low temps off of each core. I maintained room temps as close as I could to a range between 20.55-21.11 degrees C (69-70 F).
I decided to do this comparison inside a case instead of open air to see what actual performance differences might be seen in something that the normal person would actually use (instead of enthusiasts like us who will run them nekkid ). The case design is an older one that uses 2-80mm fans on the back side for ventilation and while it's not as good as newer cases in this regard it's still not bad, just a little noisy. And I don't have the i/o backplane panel installed around the i/o ports of the mobo so that gives extra room for the push-pull configurations to exhaust air. After running into clearance and crowding problems when trying to get viable numbers off of push-pull setups using the 38 mm thick fans, I decided to mod the exhaust fan area on this case for better ventilation and more room. I did this by removing the 2 internal 80 mm exhaust fans off the back side of the case and then opening the holes up and installing 2 Panaflo 92 X 25 mm M1BX fans externally on the back side of the case. That gives me another inch of room between the back of the case and the fans mounted on the heatsinks, which makes for much better efficiency for the a push-pull config with 38 mm thick fans. And I believe the results I am now showing with the fans in push-pull configuration reflect the better exhaust venting due to this modification. If you are running an older Antec SX 10xx style case (and the clones included), I would highly recommend that you make this relatively simple mod to your case for better airflow.
Last edited: