Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
My research says the same thing. I see many of the reviews commneding the desktop performance of Samsung against the other 1TB drives and it happens to be the cheapest at Newegg, so I've put the order in for one myself. I guess if you want to pay extra for a longer warranty on the Seagate, but less performance, it's the way to go.People saying these new Seagates are not as good as the old ones used to be is what made me start the thread in the first place.
Doing a 1TB review search seems the mention Samsung 1TB as being better but I need to check with you guys what the truth is.
Yeah, I've seen another, a UI or something. The UJ, as shown in your chart is the one to get.Oh good, confirmation. All right, yeah, you mean 5yr vs. 3yr warranty? Meh, unless there's word of unusual Samsung failure rates...
Does Samsung have more than one model for 1TB?
It's not like average user is going to notice a huge difference. They are all fine drives.
But tests show that Samsung is a little better than others for home and Seagate appears to be the choice for servers.
Western Digital is the quietest, but it scores a little lower on performance tests than others.
It appears Samsung for Home and Seagate for Server.
WD somewhat quieter but worse performer.
Hitachi? Both Samsung and Seagate appear to be overall better than Hitachi.
OK, now if you could just expand as to why.
Since the only thing I have to go on is that chart, which shows Samsung to be the one to get, unless you're talking about the warranty as the primary criteria?