AMD has lost a lot of ground in the last couple of months expecially with the 2200+ not being what everyone expected from the Tbred core.
I really can't understand why P4 fans keep saying this...Can anyone guess what I'm about to say? C'mon, you all know the words, lets sing it together!
W I L L A M E T T E
Now that that's out of my system...
What it all boils down to is that tawika is jealous that our ram has got more bandwidth than amd can ever dream of!
I had planned on building a P4 system since early this spring. I chose to go AMD so I could learn about their systems, and I can't say that I am disappointed. I had a Celeron 1.1a @ 1562 (second highest in the db, no fakes here, bro!) that I was thrilled with. I was even comparing it to a P4 at one time, because my benches were better! At the end of the year, I'll look at what's out there, and make up my mind then as to which brand I want to go with.
Overclockers look for the chip with the best possibilty to overclock...because that's what we do. But put those 2 systems up head to head on a DDR platform (and please don't start screaming RDRAM, according to your post above, the P4 really doesn't need it to beat AMD), and the AMD would win. But as far as overclocking goes, Intel has the ball right now, and they are running with it. But what seems to get lost in the fray of things is this: a cpu is a calculator. It does math. Even at lower speeds, AMD's do more math. A 3Ghz P4 still has trouble folding or crunching like an AMD does.
As far as your market shares are concerned, and AMD going out of business, forget it, bro. Their computer market is what you refer to...they do alot more than that! If they were ever to stop their other business ventures, and pursue solely the computer market, Intel would see a whole new kind of competition. Let's hope that never happens, right?