- Thread Starter
- #21
You'd need high-CFM, louder fans to get any real mileage out of it, and even then it barely matches most decent aircoolers on the reviews I looked at.
Also, if an aircooler fails you can limp along until you replace the fan. If the pump fails in that watercooler at load there's no chance that tiny bit of copper on the mount will do anything.. Not really worth it with the 212+ being at such a low price.
I have been doing some research and it looks like the H50 is better than the hyper 212. If my cpu cooler fails, my computer would be shut down right away. Also, the H50 would look better, and would restrict less airflow.
The only thing I dont like about the H50 is that the rear case fan has to blow air through the rad, into the case. Which will heat everything else up slightly.
I could mount the fan so it blows air through it, out the back. But then it will be pulling warm air in, thats already in the case.
But the air coolers would do the same thing anyways.
hmm..