- Joined
- Jul 29, 2001
- Thread Starter
- #121
As I said that is in the worksRollingThunder said:Coolest,
Your program is beginning to make more sense the more I use it. It is consistently showing 2-3C higher during short Prime95 runs of an hour or two than the methods used by Everest or Speedfan for detection. I would much sooner error on the side of a higher reading than readings determined by less accurate methods.
Blowing an AC 115v 3450 rpm fan used to reduce my Everest and Speedfan temps. Now that doesn't happen because obviously you really can't get into the CPU core that way with the heat sink in place.
Personally I would like to see temps in the system tray shown permanently while the program is running rather than by a hover method.
ochungry said:It Would be a good idea to have an option for user to calibrate the temp. another word, a way to increase or decrease the reading similar to MBM5. This way the user can adjust the reading according to some form of calibration. Those who remove the IHS and install a temp sensor on the core can adjust the CoreTemp according to the probe.
Well I like the idea, but it has a fault. You don't have any reference by which you could really callibrate this, a probe by the core does not give you internal core temperature.