OK, I just made the move to a Duron/DDR setup from a P3/SDRAM setup a few weeks ago. And I've really been disappointed by the FSB limitations of my new system. I believe my problem is the fabled good-overclocking Crucial DDR.
My stuff:
Abit KG7 Standard
AKBA Duron 600@866 (or similar depending on multiplier/fsb) @ 1.9 v (until I can afford a Tbird)
Taisol 742092 with 80mm Thermaltake fan and Arctic Silver II
256MB Crucial PC2100
Asus v6800 pure Geforce256 DDR
Soundblaster Live
3com 905c nic
First off, I have established the overclockability of the Duron. It's not stellar, but it does 866 fine @ 118F full load. For my FSB testing, I decrease the multiplier to 5.5 so I know the CPU isn't the bottleneck.
Secondly, all these same cards ran in my old P3 system on a 155FSB with the same AGP/PCI dividers.
My problem: the memory appears to suck to me. Won't even do any faster than the "Fast" timings @ 133/CAS2. I've never seen "Turbo" or "Ultra" timings POST at all, at any FSB (even 100).
The fastest I've even gotten it to boot at is 144. Frequent BSOD's (in Windows2000) @ 144/CAS2/"Auto" and 144/CAS2.5/"Auto". No boot @ 144/CAS2.5/"Normal". Won't even POST @ 150/CAS2.5/Auto. Yes, I have bumped the DDR voltage. Have taken it as far as 2.8v with no stability change over the KG7's default (2.65). I hesitate to push the voltage more without a heatspreader.
Everybody I talk to says Crucial is awesome and will almost always hit 150 CAS2. Wrong! I've got proof of a dud stick.
I downloaded Memtest and ran it @ 133,140,141,142,143,and 144 MHz @ CAS2.5/"Auto"/2.75v. Works fine until 143, then boom, errors on on 144. 850,000+ errors in the Memtest's second test (first pass). I cancelled the test because it was obviously bad.
Now, a question:
Does my testing with Memtest isolate the problem to the memory, or could my mobo still be in question. I understood the KG7 to be good to at least 155FSB with good components or I would have never bought this thing.
I hate dumping another $100 on Kingmax or something if my mobo is really the problem.
Moral: Don't believe everything you hear about Crucial. It doesn't all overclock well.
My stuff:
Abit KG7 Standard
AKBA Duron 600@866 (or similar depending on multiplier/fsb) @ 1.9 v (until I can afford a Tbird)
Taisol 742092 with 80mm Thermaltake fan and Arctic Silver II
256MB Crucial PC2100
Asus v6800 pure Geforce256 DDR
Soundblaster Live
3com 905c nic
First off, I have established the overclockability of the Duron. It's not stellar, but it does 866 fine @ 118F full load. For my FSB testing, I decrease the multiplier to 5.5 so I know the CPU isn't the bottleneck.
Secondly, all these same cards ran in my old P3 system on a 155FSB with the same AGP/PCI dividers.
My problem: the memory appears to suck to me. Won't even do any faster than the "Fast" timings @ 133/CAS2. I've never seen "Turbo" or "Ultra" timings POST at all, at any FSB (even 100).
The fastest I've even gotten it to boot at is 144. Frequent BSOD's (in Windows2000) @ 144/CAS2/"Auto" and 144/CAS2.5/"Auto". No boot @ 144/CAS2.5/"Normal". Won't even POST @ 150/CAS2.5/Auto. Yes, I have bumped the DDR voltage. Have taken it as far as 2.8v with no stability change over the KG7's default (2.65). I hesitate to push the voltage more without a heatspreader.
Everybody I talk to says Crucial is awesome and will almost always hit 150 CAS2. Wrong! I've got proof of a dud stick.
I downloaded Memtest and ran it @ 133,140,141,142,143,and 144 MHz @ CAS2.5/"Auto"/2.75v. Works fine until 143, then boom, errors on on 144. 850,000+ errors in the Memtest's second test (first pass). I cancelled the test because it was obviously bad.
Now, a question:
Does my testing with Memtest isolate the problem to the memory, or could my mobo still be in question. I understood the KG7 to be good to at least 155FSB with good components or I would have never bought this thing.
I hate dumping another $100 on Kingmax or something if my mobo is really the problem.
Moral: Don't believe everything you hear about Crucial. It doesn't all overclock well.