-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Experimenting with an AMD
- Thread starter Damian
- Start date
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2004
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA
DAMIEN: LOOK AT ME, EVERYONE! REACT TO ME! NOTICE ME! 
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2004
omg d4m0n, that is the craziest thing I have ever seen, lol. There d4m0n is that what you are going for?
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2004
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA
Not me. I was just summing up this thread.SewerBeing said:
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2002
- Location
- The OCFORUMS
That was evil. Maybe I missed it, but what voltage did it take to reach that? And why did you throw away nearly $150 in hardware?
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2002
- Location
- The OCFORUMS
OMG, hehe I smell photoshop and a dead cpu. Why didnt you show the whole graph? I bet it was because the cpu didnt realy have those numbers so you cut off the bars and replaced the numbers. Im just making wild guesses?!
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2003
- Location
- In front of my computer
Hmm.. 2700mhz 1700+ and you killed it.. what a waste.. mind mailing me the CPU? I would flame the hell out of you for knowing nothing about AMD to begin with, but I would probably get a nice mod warning for it. I would say a 2700mhz AMD = a good 3.6ghz P4.
I would flame the hell out of you for knowing nothing about AMD to begin with, but I would probably get a nice mod warning for it. I would say a 2700mhz AMD = a good 3.6ghz P4.
- Thread Starter
- #30
Permanoob said:
WINNER! Can't believe so many of you took this so seriously...
That was Gautam's old rig. Yes, both the NF7 and proc were dead. In case you were wondering, I'm using a 1700+ @ 2150 in my rig. I'd kill for one of these DLT3Cs; too bad this one died of natural causes.
Nope, no photoshop. Look at the molten plastic; it would be kinda hard to fake that. Graphs are real; they were taken by Gautam before the proc died.
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2003
- Location
- In front of my computer
Damian said:
Thats odd... I coulda sword I saw a 2600mhz barton do 11k....
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2003
Theres no sane person alive who would do this. Which is why nothing happened and its one big joke.
Bit early there, damien. 8 days too early
Bit early there, damien. 8 days too early
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2002
- Location
- hamburg - germany
YOU sir are a ret4rd with too much money and should be shot!
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2001
- Location
- Dark side of hell
Damian said:
Just for the peeps who missed it.
It was a joke!!!
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2002
- Location
- hamburg - germany
oops ^^
only read the first posts where said the proc was ok before he killed it...
only read the first posts where said the proc was ok before he killed it...
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2003
- Location
- Missouri
this is the second post ive seen of people destroying hardware for some reason.....and dont mind it
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2003
- Location
- SF Bay Area
Yuriman said:
I don't remember why I cropped the picture so much, but I assure you it pulled those numbers. I had it fullscreen at some hi-res or something, and there was no point in showing the bars. It outdid all reference results. The 10k felt great. I really didn't have anything to prove to anyone, just snapped a pic for the hell of it. It took real cold temps to do that (15°C). It's no mobile Barton.
dippy_skoodlez said:
No way that's possible. 11k would require 2925 MHz. In real-world, probably a couple MHz more. I got around 9800 at 2.63GHz.
Great hardware while it lasted, at least it went out with a bang.
