- Joined
- May 4, 2004
- Location
- Madison, WI
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
From what I hear they are realy sweet and very fast too.Liquid3D said:I'm looking for info on the Opteron Santa Ana Core 1212 or 1214 for Am2 sockets? Anybody?
ryboto said:I don't know if i should click the poll just yet. My Opteron 170 will get to 2800mhz (295x9.5, can't use 10x above fsb of 267 for some reason) @ 1.4v, but I can't seem to get it to go any higher. Idle temps are low, but I also don't have very high speed fans, in fact, they're all low speed, so, cooling isn't as good as it could be, so my load temps get to 50C as monitored by CORE temp. I'm debating removing the IHS to get the system to go higher, but no matter what vcore I try, it's still unstable in windows, like windows crashes unstable.
Liquid3D said:Don't remove your IHS, trust me it's not worth it. The most your going to see is a 3C ~ 7C and that is going to depend on how well you lap your heatsink base.
Anyhoo from the screenshot below I've taken using Overclocked CPU Wattage Calculator with data taken from the Processor Electrical Database your processor dissipates 165W. Rasing the multiplier places the burden on the core as opposed to the memory controller which is why you can't raise the multipler and overclock to the same frequency.
If you read through the CoreTemp thread The Coolest talks about the accuracy of the on-die sensors - ±10°C I think it was. Probably why AMD never released anything official about them. Still looks a little high, though, even at that ...Dan0512 said:CPU Type: Opteron 170
Stepping: CBBEE 0617
Best Stable OC: 2850
VCore: 1.36
Temps: Idle/Load 22/35 , 47/53
10 hour+ dual prime stable
The idle temp. of core 0 seems unrealistic to me, maybe coretemp is flawed?
dan