- Joined
- Dec 14, 2010
So, I encountered a website a while back called NiceHash. Didn't think much of it at the time, just figured it was kind of interesting that it had information on what some hardware could mine and what kind of returns per day/per month/per year one could potentially expect with the limited hardware selection they have.
Got bored over the weekend and thought I would see "how hard could it be" to set up some sort of computer to mine via this website's software just to see what I could get per day. Decided to set it up on my main PC first since it had the newest and fastest hardware I had on hand (and because it has the only card I have on hand that is compatible with their NiceHash Miner 2.0.0.1 Beta software (GTX 9XX or better (or 750 Ti)).
(CPU: Intel i7 4790K overclocked to 4.6GHz (1.23V), RAM: 2x8GB G.SKILL Trident X 2667MHz, Cooler: Corsair H105, PSU: Corsair RM650i)
My CPU (Intel Core i7 4790K @ 4.6GHz) seems to average an estimated $0.30-0.35/day running CryptoNight at 185-225 H/s usually, my GPU (EVGA GTX 980 Ti Superclocked+, overclocked to 1225MHz Base, 1389MHz max Boost speed) seems to average $1.3-1.6/day running Equihash most of the time at 400-430 H/s (with an estimated power cost of $0.78 for an estimated $0.13/KWH, this maybe isn't that profitable at a net gain of $0.55 per day on this card), though I have seen it also mine with Decred, Lyra2REv2 and Blake2s occasionally. Point of note: system seems to be much more strained when it is mining with Decred or Blake2s than when it is mining with Equihash, which I'm guessing means that Equihash is easier to mine with? It is nearly unusable when it's mining Decred or Blake2s.
For the heck of it I set up one of my benching rigs for this too, so that I could go through a few of the other cards I had on hand to see if any of them were remotely profitable (running NiceHash Miner Legacy v1.8.1.3, because they're all too old to be supported by their newer miner). (CPU: Intel i7 3770K overclocked to 4.6GHz (1.18V), RAM: 2x4GB G.SKILL Ripjaws X 1600MHz 7-8-7-24 1T @1800MHz 8-9-8-22 1T, Cooler: Noctua NH-D14, PSU: Corsair CX750M v1)
My CPU (Intel Core i7 3770K @ 4.6GHz) seems to average an estimated $0.35-0.40/day running CryptoNight at 240-290 H/s usually (not remotely profitable at an estimated energy cost of $0.62-0.7 per day, depending upon actual power draw (Estimated at 200-220W per CPU)), my GPU (EVGA GTX 780 Ti Superclocked, overclocked to 1156MHz Base (a +150MHz increase over stock, which is odd because when benchmarking 3D benches I can hit 1200MHz with just a +50MHz increase to the base, for some reason I had to add much more to get close to 1200MHz while mining), 1189MHz max Boost speed) seems to average $0.68-0.74/day (with an estimated power cost of $0.78 for an estimated $0.13/KWH, this definitely isn't profitable) running Blake2s basically constantly at 2.2-2.5 GH/s (it doesn't mine anything but Blake2s unless I force it to by disabling Blake2s on the list of algorithms in the benchmark section, which I discovered I could do purely by accident). I've reset the 780Ti to stock for now, as it keeps randomly crashing when it's highly overclocked to hit 1200MHz-ish.
The thing that really stumps me is that my 3770K from a generation back (two if you count Haswell and Haswell Refresh (Devil's Canyon) as being separate generations), at the same clock speed, is actually faster and/or more effecient at CryptoNight Algorithm mining than my newer 4790K.
Tested other cards as well:
Sapphire HD 6870 at Max OC (800MHz IIRC): $0.25-0.27/day displayed in the miner (website estimates $0.79/day, which is overly optimistic), with a $0.35/day electricity cost (estimated): not worth it
XFX HD 7850 Ultra OC edition (975MHz, stock for a 7850 is 860MHz (This card doesn't seem to officially exist as there's little to no information anywhere I could find online about this card, and absolutely nothing about it on the manufacturer's website anywhere, which would explain why when I got it I thought it had a modded and/or overclocked BIOS because it looks like the CORE Edition (but it isn't the CORE Edition card)): $0.17-0.20/day displayed in the miner with a $0.26/day power cost (website estimates $1.01/day based upon the benchmark scores, which is overly optimistic). This card is not remotely worth mining with, not only does the value of coin mined per day not exceed the power cost, but this thing heats up like a volcano when you mine on it. I had this thing mining for maybe five minutes, the core temp hit 91°C with the fan speed at 100% (not set by me, that was what the automatic fan profile did), and just kept heating up, I stopped the miner because I had no way to effectively cool this thing with the stock cooler.
EVGA GTX 580 Superclocked: $0.17-0.20/day (website estimates $1.01/day based upon the benchmark scores, which is overly optimistic), with a 0.39/day electricity cost: not worth it
It seems like for this to be overly profitable I would have to have multiple cards in multiple PC's with the effective mining performance of something like a GTX 970, GTX 980, GTX 1060, GTX 980 Ti, or GTX 1070 (or better) to make a reasonable return per day. Though I was admittedly surprised when it made $0.80 in something like 14-15 hours of mining on just the GTX 980 Ti (that was impressive to me, given that I'd never tried any form of mining before), and I think I was around $1.42 at 24 hours with the BTC value at 4300 at the time. Looks like a GTX 1070 is a better deal as far as mining goes than a GTX 980 Ti (at least power usage/electricity cost wise), the general consensus apparently varies as to which one is better for mining from a mBTC/day or dollar/day standpoint, some say the 1070 has higher hash rates, some say it has lower hash rates.
I may buy a GTX 1070 at some point and maybe sell my GTX 980 Ti, the only reason I bought a 980 Ti was because they were around $100-150 USD cheaper at the time than a new (or was it used? I forget.) 1070 at the time. Now though with the mining craze inflating the prices of cards on the used and new markets, the 980 Ti ($320-380) and 1070 ($275-400) (though I did find one at $200, and some above 450, but they were like collector's editions of cards and I consider them outliers and not the norm) are effectively the same price a lot of the time, and a new 1070 ($389.99-539.99) can be had for not much more than the resale value of a used 980 Ti ($320-380). I would not buy one of the $539.99 GTX 1070's probably, they seem overpriced (some of them are refurbished models, which in my mind should be less than the standard retail one's, since they've already had to be repaired once), I'd probably look for one around $390-450/460 if/when I'm looking to buy and if I decide to buy new.
Got bored over the weekend and thought I would see "how hard could it be" to set up some sort of computer to mine via this website's software just to see what I could get per day. Decided to set it up on my main PC first since it had the newest and fastest hardware I had on hand (and because it has the only card I have on hand that is compatible with their NiceHash Miner 2.0.0.1 Beta software (GTX 9XX or better (or 750 Ti)).
(CPU: Intel i7 4790K overclocked to 4.6GHz (1.23V), RAM: 2x8GB G.SKILL Trident X 2667MHz, Cooler: Corsair H105, PSU: Corsair RM650i)
My CPU (Intel Core i7 4790K @ 4.6GHz) seems to average an estimated $0.30-0.35/day running CryptoNight at 185-225 H/s usually, my GPU (EVGA GTX 980 Ti Superclocked+, overclocked to 1225MHz Base, 1389MHz max Boost speed) seems to average $1.3-1.6/day running Equihash most of the time at 400-430 H/s (with an estimated power cost of $0.78 for an estimated $0.13/KWH, this maybe isn't that profitable at a net gain of $0.55 per day on this card), though I have seen it also mine with Decred, Lyra2REv2 and Blake2s occasionally. Point of note: system seems to be much more strained when it is mining with Decred or Blake2s than when it is mining with Equihash, which I'm guessing means that Equihash is easier to mine with? It is nearly unusable when it's mining Decred or Blake2s.
For the heck of it I set up one of my benching rigs for this too, so that I could go through a few of the other cards I had on hand to see if any of them were remotely profitable (running NiceHash Miner Legacy v1.8.1.3, because they're all too old to be supported by their newer miner). (CPU: Intel i7 3770K overclocked to 4.6GHz (1.18V), RAM: 2x4GB G.SKILL Ripjaws X 1600MHz 7-8-7-24 1T @1800MHz 8-9-8-22 1T, Cooler: Noctua NH-D14, PSU: Corsair CX750M v1)
My CPU (Intel Core i7 3770K @ 4.6GHz) seems to average an estimated $0.35-0.40/day running CryptoNight at 240-290 H/s usually (not remotely profitable at an estimated energy cost of $0.62-0.7 per day, depending upon actual power draw (Estimated at 200-220W per CPU)), my GPU (EVGA GTX 780 Ti Superclocked, overclocked to 1156MHz Base (a +150MHz increase over stock, which is odd because when benchmarking 3D benches I can hit 1200MHz with just a +50MHz increase to the base, for some reason I had to add much more to get close to 1200MHz while mining), 1189MHz max Boost speed) seems to average $0.68-0.74/day (with an estimated power cost of $0.78 for an estimated $0.13/KWH, this definitely isn't profitable) running Blake2s basically constantly at 2.2-2.5 GH/s (it doesn't mine anything but Blake2s unless I force it to by disabling Blake2s on the list of algorithms in the benchmark section, which I discovered I could do purely by accident). I've reset the 780Ti to stock for now, as it keeps randomly crashing when it's highly overclocked to hit 1200MHz-ish.
The thing that really stumps me is that my 3770K from a generation back (two if you count Haswell and Haswell Refresh (Devil's Canyon) as being separate generations), at the same clock speed, is actually faster and/or more effecient at CryptoNight Algorithm mining than my newer 4790K.
Tested other cards as well:
Sapphire HD 6870 at Max OC (800MHz IIRC): $0.25-0.27/day displayed in the miner (website estimates $0.79/day, which is overly optimistic), with a $0.35/day electricity cost (estimated): not worth it
XFX HD 7850 Ultra OC edition (975MHz, stock for a 7850 is 860MHz (This card doesn't seem to officially exist as there's little to no information anywhere I could find online about this card, and absolutely nothing about it on the manufacturer's website anywhere, which would explain why when I got it I thought it had a modded and/or overclocked BIOS because it looks like the CORE Edition (but it isn't the CORE Edition card)): $0.17-0.20/day displayed in the miner with a $0.26/day power cost (website estimates $1.01/day based upon the benchmark scores, which is overly optimistic). This card is not remotely worth mining with, not only does the value of coin mined per day not exceed the power cost, but this thing heats up like a volcano when you mine on it. I had this thing mining for maybe five minutes, the core temp hit 91°C with the fan speed at 100% (not set by me, that was what the automatic fan profile did), and just kept heating up, I stopped the miner because I had no way to effectively cool this thing with the stock cooler.
EVGA GTX 580 Superclocked: $0.17-0.20/day (website estimates $1.01/day based upon the benchmark scores, which is overly optimistic), with a 0.39/day electricity cost: not worth it
It seems like for this to be overly profitable I would have to have multiple cards in multiple PC's with the effective mining performance of something like a GTX 970, GTX 980, GTX 1060, GTX 980 Ti, or GTX 1070 (or better) to make a reasonable return per day. Though I was admittedly surprised when it made $0.80 in something like 14-15 hours of mining on just the GTX 980 Ti (that was impressive to me, given that I'd never tried any form of mining before), and I think I was around $1.42 at 24 hours with the BTC value at 4300 at the time. Looks like a GTX 1070 is a better deal as far as mining goes than a GTX 980 Ti (at least power usage/electricity cost wise), the general consensus apparently varies as to which one is better for mining from a mBTC/day or dollar/day standpoint, some say the 1070 has higher hash rates, some say it has lower hash rates.
I may buy a GTX 1070 at some point and maybe sell my GTX 980 Ti, the only reason I bought a 980 Ti was because they were around $100-150 USD cheaper at the time than a new (or was it used? I forget.) 1070 at the time. Now though with the mining craze inflating the prices of cards on the used and new markets, the 980 Ti ($320-380) and 1070 ($275-400) (though I did find one at $200, and some above 450, but they were like collector's editions of cards and I consider them outliers and not the norm) are effectively the same price a lot of the time, and a new 1070 ($389.99-539.99) can be had for not much more than the resale value of a used 980 Ti ($320-380). I would not buy one of the $539.99 GTX 1070's probably, they seem overpriced (some of them are refurbished models, which in my mind should be less than the standard retail one's, since they've already had to be repaired once), I'd probably look for one around $390-450/460 if/when I'm looking to buy and if I decide to buy new.
Last edited: