I'm not having any problem reading my sig on my monitor, but I can see where it could be difficult, I guess. I'll change it when I'm done writing this. The lighter blue color really helped. Thanks.
35C is at full load for 10 minutes on P95 blend @4.0GHz on 4 cores (20x CPU multi, 200MHz HTT, 1.425v Vcore). Socket temperature is 55C under full load. At 3.8GHz (19x, 200MHz, 1.35v Vcore), throttling started happening after about 30mins, temps were 53C at the socket, 35C at the core.
Cool N Quite, C1E, Turbo Boost, and Smart-Q Fan control are all disabled in BIOS, and Windows is in High Performance mode. I don't see a C6 option anywhere, so I assume I don't have it? Sorry, C6 only applies with the FX CPUs. My bad.
From what I can tell, my case/CPU cooler aren't what are holding me back, because my temps (from what I can tell) are reasonable. I mean, 55C max at the socket at 4.0GHz? 35C core? I'm pretty sure I've seen both temps a lot hotter in HWMonitor pics from other users on this same CPU with stock coolers. I'm not trying to break records, I just want a stable overclock.
I posted a thread in the CPU section a little while ago about the throttling, and someone said that throttling is also based on TDP. Is that the max TDP of the CPU, or the motherboard, or both? My current board is rated for 125w, and at x4 with this processor, HWMonitor and CPU-z report 107w at stock, up to 131w overclocked and 159w at x6 idle. Could that have something to do with the throttling? Yes, the throttling can certainly be related to the TDP limitation of the motherboard combined with the overclocking you have done which has increased the power draw. That's probably what's going on. I just wanted to make sure you eliminated the other variables first. What you want is a board rated for 140W TDP. Typically, they are ones that have a heatsink covering the mosfets and VRMs in the area between the CPU socket and the I/O ports at the back edge of the board. The ASRock motherboard I referenced you fits that bill.