• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

TEAM CUP 2017

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.
SC3: MISC 1: Stage 1 - WPrime 1024M S478 (2 CPUs) Tech Tweaker/Pentium 4 3.2GHz (Northwood)/3234.749 (53 min 54 sec 749 msec)

This socket 478 system is slow... Amazed a system with a power supply manufactured by a company named "Maxpower" is stable.

Edit: I improved that score, forgot to turn off stuff that was running in the background in that first run. (and other things I won't discuss outside the team lounge)

SC3: MISC 1: Stage 1 - WPrime 1024M S478 (2 CPUs) Tech Tweaker/Pentium 4 3.2GHz (Northwood)/2825.031 (47 min 5 sec 31 msec)
 
Last edited:
I don't think that matters. Never has before. Usually all you need is the CPUz link the screenshot is only needed for the competition probably to verify it was done for the comp
http://hwbot.org/news/8633_application_21_rules/
Well, I thought it was in the rules that cpu and ram tabs were required, guess not. That's the way I'd always done memory subs. The fact that most other teams seemed to be displaying both tabs also made me think that was the case.

 
Last edited:
No worries it wouldn't be the first time I've messed up a sub
Getting the APEX set up soon to get an XTU and 3D01 sub in
 
I'm warming up my socket 939 rig, installing updates and programs now. Board thankfully still works. Was having weird issues at first, kept crashing and blue screening, turned out I apparently had the memory frequency too high for the CPU overclock I was at (I had forgotten about the weird balancing act one has to do on this platform between CPU frequency and memory frequency (at least I remembered to lower the multi for the HT Link frequency to keep it below 1100MHz though). After turning that down a notch the system seems to be stable now.

Wow, it's been a while since I've run this platform. Still remember some of the rules for overclocking on this platform, and thankfully I still have old screenshots saved so that I have some idea of what to set the voltage to for X.XX core frequency.

Will take a run at Cinebench R15 and see what I can do with my Athlon 64 X2 4200+ Toledo. Might even take a crack at my Athlon 64 X2 4800+ and Opteron 165 (neither of which I ever apparently tested), thought I had tested the Opty, but I bought it near the end of my time benching 939 chips and apparently didn't get around to it.
 
Great job Johan and TT! We're in decent shape for that ram stage but any improvement you could get Johan would be awesome. TT...since you're running 939, maybe you could take a shot at a faster ddr1 sub?

Set up z97/4790k yesterday. Need to find my Samsung sticks :/ Once up and running, will shoot for a stronger ddr3 sub so if anyone gets close to or can beat my ddr4 sub, we can use my (hopefully ok) ddr3 one.

Working on getting my gtx980 flashed and running properly. Hope to go cold again next weekend and chip out some more stuff
 
SC1: Stage 2 - SuperPI 32M 5GHz LGA1155 (3 CPUs) ----jiccman1965/3770K/06m.36.959---Johan45/3570k/ 6m 29.328s---Tech Tweaker/Core i5 2500K/7min 20sec 40ms (I have improved this further, but haven't submitted it yet.)

SC1: Stage 6 - Cinebench R15 S939 (3 CPUs)--- ||Console|| / X2 4400+/ 88CB --- Tech Tweaker/Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Toledo)/124CB (I beat my old max score, yay! May be able to achieve higher core frequency, wouldn't bet on it though as I'm having difficulty keeping it stable at 3GHz, increasing the memory frequency even a little bit beyond 215MHz results in blue screens (weird because I have a file to tell me what my TCCD sticks can typically handle, and it's never been wrong before).

SC3: Stage 2 - 3DMark01 GTX 200 (3 GPUs)--- jiccman1965/GTX 280/93566 --- Tech Tweaker/GTX 260 216SP/74575 (may need to load up XP, (or put this in my 1150 system, and see if scores improve) as I seem to be scoring 10-15K less than I was expecting based upon others with similar hardware). Maybe XP gives a bigger boost to scores than I remember it giving.
 
Last edited:
Updated. I should be able to get my 285 done sometime but for some reason I could not get 3D01 to run.Spent most of a day with different versions of XP and driver etc.. 3D03 would work just fine. I was baffled and had to stop
 
"SC4: Stage 6 - Geekbench3 LGA1150 (3 CPUs) ||Console||/Core i5 4670K/14889 --- Tech Tweaker/Core i7 4790K/17792 "

I'm not an hbot guy, what does the 3 cpus ^^^^^ mean?
 
"SC4: Stage 6 - Geekbench3 LGA1150 (3 CPUs) ||Console||/Core i5 4670K/14889 --- Tech Tweaker/Core i7 4790K/17792 "

I'm not an hbot guy, what does the 3 cpus ^^^^^ mean?
It means the team has to get three different members to run the benchmark and submit (and each has to be using a different CPU).

Same goes for GPU benchmarks where it says (2 GPU's) or (3 GPU's), different GPU for each submission.
 
Managed to get a couple figured out. 3D01 still won't seem to run in XP on the combo.

---Johan45/7350k/XTU/918
---Johan45/GTX 285/ 102985
 
Had an issue with Aquamark tried to upload the file for the bench, it keep telling me it's invalid. So I message HWBOT they said the video resolution was to high so I dropped it to make the file smaller still have the same issue. I have messed Massman but still have not herd back yet. Not sure what the issue is but will keep working at it.
 
Check the file extension make sure it's saving that too.
 
SC4: Stage 5 - 3DMark Vantage LGA1155 HD6000 (2 GPUs)----jiccman1965/HD 6970/27626--- Johan45/HD 6950/ 25001
 
Yeah 6800 series was so so I have a 6850 here that a toad
 
Back