- Joined
- Oct 27, 2005
- Location
- Lake Village, IN 46349
yeah, kinda weird that he would compare the 2 and not keep the variables the same.
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
HousERaT said:so far people are stating a 1-2° difference in favor of the IFX over the 120 Extreme with a small overclock. That should go up as you pump in more volts. Quad core should be better on this cooler compared to any other heatsink.
HousERaT said:so far people are stating a 1-2° difference in favor of the IFX over the 120 Extreme with a small overclock. That should go up as you pump in more volts. Quad core should be better on this cooler compared to any other heatsink.
Before: E6600 (polished), 3.42 GHz @ 1,35VCore, Ultra-120 of extremes (polished), Coollaboratory liquid metal sauce Idle 34°, load 58° with approx. 22° ambient temperature
Now: E6600 (polished), 3.42 GHz @ 1,35VCore, IFX-14 (convex), Thermalright ChillFactor Idle 31°, load 57° with approx. 23° ambient temperature.
IKIKUINTHENUTZ said:
Ps: Reddy, why didnt you stop me >>
White_Pawn said:I want a comparison of this cooler vs the Gemini II...
IKIKUINTHENUTZ said:
Ps: Reddy, why didnt you stop me >>
treatmentx said:lol that IM window is hilarious
Definitely share your findings!