- Joined
- Dec 14, 2010
is the zalman cnps10x any better then 212 evo? cause have seen it priced for 30 at some places.
i have a old school zalman 9500led how much better are these solutions compared to what i got? i can maybe manage 45bucks but wanna keep it no more then that
The Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo beats the Zalman CNPS9500 by a lot. At Frostytech the 212 Evo scored 12.8°C above ambient on AMD and the CNPS9500 scored 23.8°C above ambient on AMD (CNPS9500 only has test results for AMD there). Not too surprising though considering that the 212 Evo is using much newer technology (it came out in 2012), when the 9500 came out in 2005.
The CNPS10X scored 13.9°C above ambient on AMD, to the 9500's 23.8°C.
So, the CM Hyper 212 Evo beats the Zalman CNPS10X by 1.1°C. If you add another fan to the 212 Evo then it will likely perform even better, whereas with the CNPS10X you are limited to just one fan.
Also, I've used the CNPS9500 LED before and I found its fan to be loud and annoying at full speed. The one I used had a high-pitched whine to it when the fan is run at full speed. I upgraded to a Thermalright Ultima 90 and found it to be cooler and much quieter in the same pc (using Zalman ZF9225ASH and Yate Loon D90SM-12 fans).
Last edited: