Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
The Intel® Application Optimization determines and directs application resources in real time. This policy optimizes thread scheduling along with application threading for selected software titles and may improve performance for supported applications. System responsiveness may vary based on configuration and graphics card capabilities. Users can disable Intel Application Optimization through this software for all applications or on a per application basis if results are not as expected.
Intel® Application Optimizer is an optional part of the optimization technology that allows users to see what games are optimized and to turn off optimizations they do not want. Users may disable the entire application or disable specific games under “Enable/Disable Individual Applications” tab. The list will vary from user to user, depending on the games detected and optimized by Intel®.
Intel® Application Optimization can be downloaded through Microsoft Store*. Intel® Application Optimization is currently not available for download through Intel download center.
It could just be a soft limitation... we don't, for sure, know this CAN'T work with older gen e-cores. We know it doesn't, currently. If there's an internal hardware difference, I'd be surprised.I'm not aware of Intel saying similar in this case, or of any known changes that could explain this.
Is 14th gen selling poorly? IMO if someone were to build a new Intel system today, there is little reason to pick 13th gen over the same model 14th gen part. At least in UK, the cost of the 14th model is fractionally more than the same placed 13th gen part. If the price of the 13th gen were much lower relative to 14th gen it could complicate matters, but we're not there. If you have a 12 or 13 gen based system, you probably shouldn't be looking at 14th unless you're moving up tiers at the same time. Older gens will see a big increase regardless.It feels like they give people a reason to buy 14th gen CPUs as they sell poorly, and the whole web is full of "don't buy 14th gen, it's actually the same as 13th gen".
Well, it's a mix one 7000 series up top, several 5000 series, 2 7000 series, then Intel. AMD is selling better, but not sure if Intel considers that poor? I wouldn't expect the 14900K to sell more than chips that costs half the price and a gen old.Actually, a couple of days we heard that only 7800X3D is selling better than all Intel CPUs together - one of the reposts https://en.overclocking.com/the-ryzen-7-7800x3d-is-finally-a-bestseller/
Intel CPUs are really not selling well when you look at numbers. The same story is in other countries and distribution that I know.
"Blinded by the light. Revved up like a deuce, another runner in the night" - MMEBHard to argue with a top of the line AMD that runs the same or better than a top of the line Intel for gaming, but manages to be ~$200 cheaper on average...
Edit: I found the similar GPU data for illustration about the interpretation of such:
AMD have the volume advantage over nvidia at mindfactory that week. Look at Steam Hardware Survey, and for all the "bad sales" claims nvidia 40 series have attracted, that series alone is greater than all AMD GPU users in total. Not even close.