krewekitchen
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2020
Build = AMD Ryzen 3900x / MSI MEG X570 ACE / ROG 2070 Super (2x in NVlink) / 2-2TB M2 SSD / 128 GB RAM DDR4 3,200 mHz
Using Time Spy
Baseline with 1x2070 Super, no overclock w/ Gsync enabled = 9,798
1.) 2x2070 Supers, no overclock w/ Gsync = 14,813
2.) 2x2070 Supers, CPU OC w/ Gsync = 17,660 (CPU Ratio =43.00 / FCLK = 1600 mHz / CPU CV = 1.35V / A-XMP = profile 1)
3.) 2x2070 Supers, no CPU OC w/ Gsync = 17,615 (*CPU Ratio =auto / FCLK = 1600 mHz / CPU CV = 1.35V / A-XMP = profile 1)
4.) 2x2070 Supers, no CPU OC, GPU OC w/ Gsync (run #1) = 17,986 (*CPU Ratio = auto / FCLK = 1600 mHz / CPU CV = 1.35V / A-XMP = profile 1 / GPU OC with AB OC scan, +125 PL, +400 MC)
5.) 2x2070 Supers, no CPU OC, GPU OC w/ Gsync (run #2) = 17,774 ( CPU Ratio = auto / FCLK = 1600 mHz / CPU CV = 1.35V / A-XMP = profile 1 / GPU OC with AB OC scan, +125 PL, +400 MC)
Ran back to back runs after GPU overclock using MSI Afterburner OC Scan to verify results from test # 4 - pretty pleased with results from no CPU overclock and a moderate boost to GPU's. Tables below are the comparison of #1 baseline and #4.
I am no expert, reason for posting is to get some feedback on the performance increases, reasonable and expected for this type of build? Is the equipment under performing or over performing. Any of the KPI's in the tables below look out of whack? Thanks in advance for your feedback
Using Time Spy
Baseline with 1x2070 Super, no overclock w/ Gsync enabled = 9,798
1.) 2x2070 Supers, no overclock w/ Gsync = 14,813
2.) 2x2070 Supers, CPU OC w/ Gsync = 17,660 (CPU Ratio =43.00 / FCLK = 1600 mHz / CPU CV = 1.35V / A-XMP = profile 1)
3.) 2x2070 Supers, no CPU OC w/ Gsync = 17,615 (*CPU Ratio =auto / FCLK = 1600 mHz / CPU CV = 1.35V / A-XMP = profile 1)
4.) 2x2070 Supers, no CPU OC, GPU OC w/ Gsync (run #1) = 17,986 (*CPU Ratio = auto / FCLK = 1600 mHz / CPU CV = 1.35V / A-XMP = profile 1 / GPU OC with AB OC scan, +125 PL, +400 MC)
5.) 2x2070 Supers, no CPU OC, GPU OC w/ Gsync (run #2) = 17,774 ( CPU Ratio = auto / FCLK = 1600 mHz / CPU CV = 1.35V / A-XMP = profile 1 / GPU OC with AB OC scan, +125 PL, +400 MC)
Ran back to back runs after GPU overclock using MSI Afterburner OC Scan to verify results from test # 4 - pretty pleased with results from no CPU overclock and a moderate boost to GPU's. Tables below are the comparison of #1 baseline and #4.
I am no expert, reason for posting is to get some feedback on the performance increases, reasonable and expected for this type of build? Is the equipment under performing or over performing. Any of the KPI's in the tables below look out of whack? Thanks in advance for your feedback