• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

Which of the following would you recommend?

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.
I have all of the above ... I used to have age of mythology but I deleted it cuz it sucked hardcore!
If you have to choose 1 .... Id say Fifa 2003 no doubt! its fun and it feels like your actually in the game :cool:
The graphics are great, the gameplay is awesome ... just a definate 10!!
UT2003 is cool but watch ... in few months its going to be absolete ... something else is gonna come out.
 
I don't really agree with the UT2k3 comment, I think it will be around for a while. Once more people make the jump from UT, the community will thrive more so than it is already.

It's a great game, and great games usually stick around, regardless of what else comes out. I still play the original Tribes, Renegade mod ;)
 
i wouldnt go with MOH FL as it is hard as hell to aim on a ps2 dualshock
 
Last edited:
Oh I get it, i thought they were all the same system. sorry:cool: :beer:.

If it were me I would get NHL 2003, that series has always been good (but i havent played 2003) and I like hockey better than soccer :).
 
Don't get age of mythology, thats for sure. All RTS's are horrible on consoles, not so much the graphical structure but the control. I love StarCraft on the PC but on the N64...wow...talk about impossible!!

I'm not into console gaming much...but in my short time of console experience I've liked hockey over anything. I think FIFA is soccer (don't burn if it isn't :p) and I was never too into soccer. Maybe it'd be more fun if you didn't have to do all that running?

MOH FL is terrible on the PS2. Allied Assault was decent at best... horrible reload animations and just a terrible 3D engine all-over (lots of missed frames, maybe its my video card but that's a G4 64MB MX440, and my computer laughs at the game with only 50% PC usage). The playability lacked, too. It was sort of monotomous and although it's a (sort of) stunning leap in AI, it was almost too hard; in one level, you're inserted into a rainy French town to escort a tank crew to a German Tiger tank. The town had clearly been bombarded relentlessly by artillery, making it the perfect hiding ground for German snipers...45 of them! I play all games on the most difficult settings, btw. No point in beating a game if it's not doing its best to stop you.
By that conclusion and a horrible experience with Halo's First Person Shooter Console-basis, I'd agree that MOH FL is no good because of playability and impossibility to aim while jumping/reloading/switching to grenade to fend off 10 or 15 enemies at times.

So stick with the hockey :p
 
Agreed- BF1942 is the most ownage game when you're not without a vehicle!!

I.E.- HAVE YOU EVER TRIED KILLING A TANK WITH A 1 SHOT RIFLE?!
 
Can you do it? Usually i just run behind it with a bazooka and shoot it one shot in the back and it blows. Its great, on levels with lots of tanks I always end up blowing like atleast 15 of em up.
 
I love it when ppl either don't know or forget.. AA guns make great defensive weapons if you got the angle to shoot..

I always mow down flag grabbers and they make short work of tanks also.. you cann kill a tank with an AA alone.. :)
 
if you have medal of honor allied assault, get the expansion Spearhead, if you dont get medal of honor allied assault.

i ought to look into bf1942, everybody keeps talking about it, hows the game play compared to mohaa?
 
Download the demo's.. but its pretty much the same except better due to vehicles and some of the physics..

Its funny watching ppl literally blown off the clifs and fall flailing and screaming down tot he bottom.
 
Back