Funny how much lower the CFM rating is when it's honest. Most ~2k fans are "rated" at >100
i believe most fans are honest. however how CFM is tested can be controversal. There's the wind tunnel method, and then there's the cross sectional method. Of which, the cross sectional method usually measure a higher CFM, (as it is a function of air and velocity) where the tunnel method measures actual air moved. Now some will say 'hey, should all use the actual air move' as standard? we will 'think' so, however some fans, like those with 3-fins, will do quite poorly in the wind tunnel, as the air they move is too segmented.
for fans like AP-15, where the airflow is not segmented, the wind tunnel is perfect, however for some delta fans, the wind tunnel tend to 'completely under count' the CFM.. so they will use the cross section method instead.
At the end of the day. I think for us, we should use 'PERFORMANCE' to measure it. If it is a radiator fan, measure the temp, etc. Just to be sure the fan does its FUNCTION, which is cooling.