Are you referring to the CPU or the die size?
ATM has a point if you look here you'll see the actual 6700K die is a fraction of the size of the CPU
I meant the physical size of the whole thing not just die. Sorry for being cofusive.
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Are you referring to the CPU or the die size?
ATM has a point if you look here you'll see the actual 6700K die is a fraction of the size of the CPU
I meant the physical size of the whole thing not just die. Sorry for being cofusive.
That is called the CPU package.
This thread has a year and we still aren't sure when Zen will be released. Premiere doesn't mean it will be available in stores. There are also only rumours about X370 and some cheaper CPUs. I'm just not sure what to think about it. It looks like constant delays and we can receive already "old chip". Before we get good motherboards and all early issues will be solved then Intel will release next generation. I don't want to see that but exactly the same is with graphics cards.
This does seem to be turning in to another perfect opportunity for AMD to deliver too little, too late. But, if CPU speeds have reached something of a plateau for the next couple years, and Zen is actually competitive, they could probably still turn this in to a win.
All of this magic will happen thanks to a “Security Co-Processor” that AMD has included inside of the Zen chip. Before we get into any explicit details – let me explain what all the fuss is about. I will explain by giving the example of this very publication. WCCFTech is hosted on a VPS based platform that scales according to the traffic we get – in other words, its hosted on the cloud. This means we don’t have to pay for server resourced we aren’t using and aren’t left stranded when traffic spikes. When we say its hosted on the cloud, what is actually happening is an instance of a virtualized server running on a physical server. This virtualized server can scale up or down (depending on the limits of the physical server) dynamically according to the demand of the client and is hosted primarily in the RAM.
Zen will also contain hardware SHA – which means it’s going to offer significant performance improvement over previous iterations of AMD architectures and even Intel offerings! As far as we know, hardware based SHA will not be present in Intel offerings till Cannonlake arrives and we have already listed the major disadvantage of SGX – it cannot be virtualized. So at the time of launch, Zen processors will be the only competitive x86 chips around rocking hardware based SHA (and the accelerated performance that comes with it) as well as the security co processor powered SME/SEV security features. It remains to be seen when and if Intel will offer a competing solution to SEV.
Question about ZEN.
Reducing TDP down to 65w, when the previous generation (A8, A10) on higher TDP had issues with APM reducing CPU frequency when iGPU under full load.
Won't this be even worse or not change with the new gen?
I know they say it's is more efficient & all that marketing blah-blah., but I am worried switching to an A12, realising the iGPU is powerful, but the CPU doesn't handle 2017 AAA titles.
Perfect example Total War: Warhammer on an APU.
Now I know, best thing is to get a dedicated GPU, not everyone has or will have the budget for super-rigs (which is the whole point of an APU, IMO and I think AMD's goal too).
Any thoughts on this?
Unless I'm completely wrong and AMD Zen APU's are gonna be the next best thing, a breakthough - along with tickets to space & spacemiles?
It depends on what they did to mitigate the issue. Less power doesn't mean it will happen again, but I can see why one would connect the two for sure.
APU isn't great for a lot of those CPU bound titles is the real issue IMO.
Zen is going to be a great CPU for AMD, I am sure of it... so long as its performance lands somewhere around Haswell or greater.
I havne't seen any...Does anyone have any info on the limitations of the Zen architecture, in relation to DDR4 & the frequency limits of this next-gen RAM having not yet been reached?
I really don't think its going to matter as much as you want it to. Though the iGPU responds well to increase in system ram bandwidth, where does it end for those 'barely passable as a gaming solution' iGPUs? I thought there was already on the downside in fast DDR3 (read 2666+)? I don't recall.Dreaming of an APU with iGPU that supports DDR4 at 4000mhz...dreaming...