Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
The 3930k has a TDP of 130W while the 8350 only has a TDP of 125W. Does the 8350 have a similar issue to the Ivy Bridge chips?
Good call and good suggestion Atminside! An Evo wouldn't get you very far on an 8350, even with the fans replaced!
NiHaoMike, that TDP is laughable. At stock settings maybe, it's a 125w chip. Take off the turbo boost and OC it on all 8 cores and it's drawing a whole lot more.while the 8350 only has a TDP of 125W.
Bob no difference between a 8320 and a 8350 at 4.5. Though trying to be practical running high speed fans at 100% just to keep it cool isn't my idea of a user friendly rig. I have tested my 8350 with a Prolimatech Megahalems and could do 4.6 daily with a pair of Scythe Slipstreams 110 cfm on it but again listening to fans that loud isn't my cup of tea.Depends on the chip 212 is doing WAY more than I expected on my 8320 (yeah yeah its not an "8350", but its been running at 4.5+ 24/7 for months now). I would LIKE to get a better cooler for one reason only -> SOUND. I have two fans on it, and it's obscenely loud all the time lol.
but again listening to fans that loud isn't my cup of tea.
What's funny about the D14 is it comes with a low noise adapter to reduce the fan speed to quiet it down even more. It's just not neccesary. With my HD7950 idling it's louder than the NH-D14.
Just ran an unscientific test with my Kill O watt meter. At my daily OC settings of 4.7 @ 1.46 Cpu V with power saving features on. Idle watts drawn 150w, running prime 95 for 20 minutes avg draw 380W. This is with a Coolermaster Silent Pro Gold 1000w psu.
Depends on the chip 212 is doing WAY more than I expected on my 8320 (yeah yeah its not an "8350", but its been running at 4.5+ 24/7 for months now). I would LIKE to get a better cooler for one reason only -> SOUND. I have two fans on it, and it's obscenely loud all the time lol.
An 8350 at 4.5 is the same as a 8320 at 4.5, it all depends on the chip but it should be able to do it with no problem. It also depends on the motherboard you have. You should set up a signature!If you can get a stable 4.5 on an 8320 with an Evo 212 I wonder what I'll be able to do with an 8350 and NH d14!
An 8350 at 4.5 is the same as a 8320 at 4.5, it all depends on the chip but it should be able to do it with no problem. It also depends on the motherboard you have. You should set up a signature!
It all depends on the chip from what I've seen yes some 8350's will Oc higher then a 8320 but if at the same clock speed they are equal.Well I was told whatever the 8320 could do the 8350 could do better. But if I can get an 4.6 overclock I'd probably be happy.
It all depends on the chip from what I've seen yes some 8350's will Oc higher then a 8320 but if at the same clock speed they are equal.
...Do those adapters let any fan both pull their full power needed to run at max speed? Or do they run slower because of it?
You're probably correct that a 8320 is a lesser chip as far as quality goes, as a 8350 but most 8320 and 8350's will get you to 4.5 that I've seen. It is also very dependent on the board it's on. That said when really pushing to extremes on ambient cooling, it's likely that a 8350 will OC higher.My understanding is that 8320s are 8350s that didn't make the cut in terms of quality. Similar to how my r9 290 is a 290x that didn't make the cut. I also did get an 8320 and buy an Evo 212 to overclock it but I figured I'd get the better chip and overclock later. Especially since microcenter had the 8350's for only $160.
You're probably correct that a 8320 is a lesser chip as far as quality goes, as a 8350 but most 8320 and 8350's will get you to 4.5 that I've seen. It is also very dependent on the board it's on. That said when really pushing to extremes on ambient cooling, it's likely that a 8350 will OC higher.