Seems like the point that was missed here in the minutia is that you reach a point where you are uncomfortable or using too high of voltage. Ambiently cooled water just isn't enough. Typically, you run out of voltage headroom. So while deltaT is a consideration, there other factors you run into to FIRST on these chips. You are always welcome to disagree, but seeing where these chips top out under "acceptable" voltages is how I came up with my original post.Obviously I struck some kind of nerve with my comments?
Any increased overclocking voltage at all is accelerating degradation, which is an acceptable side effect to any of us that overclock, it truly depends on just how far you desire to go!
Why use voltage degradation as an excuse on a CPU that has not even been on the market long enough to even know for sure what it's daily run voltage limits even are when it relates to CPU overclock longevity?
My comments regarding lower DeltaT allowing higher overclocks seem to be past common acceptable knowledge here, which I am baffled by since this is Overclockers.com.
Water cooling with radiators is not simply a cookie cutter setup, unless you have zero overclocking intentions, but if you have overclocking intentions, DeltaT is a major factor relating to ambient water cooling.
DeltaT will be a determining factor on just how far you get overclocking, and DeltaT is relevant to the radiator cooling field.
That's what say I.
(Sorry for the delay in response, I was moving over the past week)
Edit: let's bring the focus back on the op, and stop double posting while we are at it (combined a few).
Last edited: