wild_andy_c said:
A thunderbird would need to run at approximatley 1975Mhz to acheive that score.
looking back at your posts, i know you know alot but i think you are 110% wrong.
using the chart u posted, it says XP1500@1333 is only matched by a tbird 1500 correct.
that is wrong, i have a 1333tbird, and it performs the SAME as a Xp1500, there was less then a 20 point difference in sisiandra cpu bench.
The Xp has more instructions not more more clocks per cycle, the PR rating is just to battle the intel mhz race. A Xp1500(1333) is HARDLY FASTER then a tbird 1333. I have benhced then in the same box side by side, tehy score basically the same, and that SiSandra bench posted, it was an Xp chip correct scoring in the 4500 range, and the PR is 1975, and u say that is whwat a tbird would have to run at to get that score - i got pics to prove that wrong. My tbird at 1575 i get 4460, and at 10x160=1600 i get a score above 4500. I CAN POST PICS< WHNE I GET HOME. What i think u mean (or forgot)that PR rating is not wat a TBIRD has to run at to achieve the same score, its what an INTEL has to run at to get that score
PR rating for XP's are NOT the Tbird equivalent, it is the INTEL equivelent, so its an INTEL chip that has to run at 1975 mhz to get that same score as an XP did. Will someome back me up with this by posting pics, i can t yet as im at work.
i promise you any tbird running at the same speed ( actual speed) as an XP will get less then a 100pt difference. A tbird at 1975 mhz would get almost 4700 if not more