Clevor -
I personally would like to say thanks for all your input. I have a habit of doing my own testing regardless of websites and forums, but its gentlemen like you who make me lazy, lol so stop it. j/k
Your wording and grammarical (if thats even a word) skills are great and i appreciate you speaking in plain ol engrish instead of some of the more technical terminology i have seen people speak, or rather type.
I just got my TCCD OCZ Plat Rev 2 today, PC3200 btw. and am benching and testing.
out of the box i just booted into windows to see if its ok,, and it is. odd that the DFI bios, im using the real DFI beta bios, sets the timings to 2-3-2-5 1T instead of 2-2-2-5. nothing big but something to make note of. Also running 2.8v. everything else in the DFI bios for mem timings is AUTO
I have rebooted and took a baby step and went to 210 HTT rebooted 2.1ghz memtest is ok. and ran sandra and 3dmark 05.
- Sandra memory benchmark yielded an absolutely horrbile 3000+ points.
(not sure what "on par" should be but scores that low make me want to smash my system.
- 3dmark 05 - 575X
(sorry didnt write it down, but that is impressive, to me, for only running 2.1ghz)
memtest is almost finished its second round at 220mhz 2-3-2-5 with no errors. I was getting massive errors at 2-2-2-5 so had to drop a little.
I'll bench and report back.
Test System -
A64 SKT 754 3200+ Clawhammer CG
DFI Lanparty UT 250GB w/ DFI Beta Bios (god i love memtest built into the bios)
1 gig dual channel kit of OCZ PC3200 EL Plat Rev 2 - TCCD
BFG 6800 GT OC - 450/1150 Nvidia 75.90 drivers
XP Pro SP2 and XP 64bit (i will test 64bit after Pro)
I also have Suse 9.2 64bit installed so i will post some impressions of that also, does anyone know of a linux 64bit mem benchmark program ?
btw i got my SmartJoy FRAG today so all you xbox LIVE Controller Communists gard your grill.
I also dont have 3dmark 2000, only 01 03 and 05 and Aquamark if anyone is willing to share the free version of 2000 with me ill do some testing. but 3dmark 2003 and 2001 were suppose to be memory and cpu intensive also werent they ?
I personally would like to say thanks for all your input. I have a habit of doing my own testing regardless of websites and forums, but its gentlemen like you who make me lazy, lol so stop it. j/k
Your wording and grammarical (if thats even a word) skills are great and i appreciate you speaking in plain ol engrish instead of some of the more technical terminology i have seen people speak, or rather type.
I just got my TCCD OCZ Plat Rev 2 today, PC3200 btw. and am benching and testing.
out of the box i just booted into windows to see if its ok,, and it is. odd that the DFI bios, im using the real DFI beta bios, sets the timings to 2-3-2-5 1T instead of 2-2-2-5. nothing big but something to make note of. Also running 2.8v. everything else in the DFI bios for mem timings is AUTO
I have rebooted and took a baby step and went to 210 HTT rebooted 2.1ghz memtest is ok. and ran sandra and 3dmark 05.
- Sandra memory benchmark yielded an absolutely horrbile 3000+ points.
(not sure what "on par" should be but scores that low make me want to smash my system.
- 3dmark 05 - 575X
(sorry didnt write it down, but that is impressive, to me, for only running 2.1ghz)
memtest is almost finished its second round at 220mhz 2-3-2-5 with no errors. I was getting massive errors at 2-2-2-5 so had to drop a little.
I'll bench and report back.
Test System -
A64 SKT 754 3200+ Clawhammer CG
DFI Lanparty UT 250GB w/ DFI Beta Bios (god i love memtest built into the bios)
1 gig dual channel kit of OCZ PC3200 EL Plat Rev 2 - TCCD
BFG 6800 GT OC - 450/1150 Nvidia 75.90 drivers
XP Pro SP2 and XP 64bit (i will test 64bit after Pro)
I also have Suse 9.2 64bit installed so i will post some impressions of that also, does anyone know of a linux 64bit mem benchmark program ?
btw i got my SmartJoy FRAG today so all you xbox LIVE Controller Communists gard your grill.
I also dont have 3dmark 2000, only 01 03 and 05 and Aquamark if anyone is willing to share the free version of 2000 with me ill do some testing. but 3dmark 2003 and 2001 were suppose to be memory and cpu intensive also werent they ?
Last edited: