Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
It is my understanding that Intel have boosts for various given number of active cores, but they generally only advertise base and single core turbo. Usually I have to go to one of Anandtech, wikichip, or wikipedia to try and find out what the turbo is at 2 to all cores, with all core turbo being the more interesting.Modern Intel CPUs have a base clock, an all core boost, and dual thread boost.
As per Intel Guy, no one is overclocking if turbo rooster is enabled. It is considered an "in spec" operation. Intel can just do it for certain times period, and amd can run in turbo if cooling and power limit is within limit.
Correct. Only recently they have stopped listing each boost clock for a core count.. so I simplified things... too much.It is my understanding that Intel have boosts for various given number of active cores, but they generally only advertise base and single core turbo. Usually I have to go to one of Anandtech, wikichip, or wikipedia to try and find out what the turbo is at 2 to all cores, with all core turbo being the more interesting.
I read it as sinsemilla initially
Obviously not what’s going on here heh..
Well, terminology aside, my Ryzen 2700 has a boost clock of 4.2 ghz which when I monitor it I only see that under idle and light loads here and there occasionally at default settings. So I guess I have "underclocked" it, technically speaking, on all cores, to 4.05 ghz to get a 20% better score when running Cinebench R20 than I do at default values and a definitely snappier boot up experience on top of that. Call it what you want, but it performs like an "overclock" to me.
Trents, Sir, perhaps it drops out of turbo under load due to temps?
Actually, I do have some small individual copper mosfet heat sinks made by Enoz on those north side mosfets. Not sure it helped any. Keep in mind this is a mini ITX case so it is pretty cramped. Air circulation is not great.