You write >> Multipler @ 19,5.
I write >> Lovely.
You write >> FSB @ 240
I write >> Lovely if the ram is not overclocked to instability. Looking it seems not.
You write >> CPU/NB @ 2400
I write >> Lovely if the CPU_NB voltage is set approximately 1.3V or very slightly less.
You write >> HT Link @ 2400
I write >> Standard default is 2600Mhz and seems fine to run at 2600Mhz.
You write >> RAM @ ~1333. 9-9-9-24-33
I write >> Okay that lowering to DDR1333 seems in line with you raising FSB to 240 from stock 200 which has clocked ram back up in speed.
You write >> Upped Vcore to 1,4625V
I write >> Vcore may vary in how much each user may need to bring about stability, so that will depend on how much it takes to stop worker failure and YET stay within CPU and "Package" temp suggestions of 70c and 60c respectively.
You write >> Upped CPU/NB Manual Voltage to 1,1375 from 1,1.
I write >> AS I wrote above it may take up to 1.3V to stabilize the 2400Mhz CPU_NB speed you have set. AMD says that up to 1.35V is acceptable. Increased CPU_NB voltage can raise temps slightly so it is a balancing act of trial and error at your end to give enough CPU_NB voltage and I seldom set mine below 1.2875V any longer.
You write >> Upped NB Voltage to 1,1375 from 1,1.
I write >> I have never seen anyone raise that voltage for any reason since it seems fine at default voltage. It is not usually considered to have anything to do with stability of any sort.
You write >> Lowered NB HT Voltage from 1,2 to 1,150. The HT freq is lowered from 2600 to 2400, so figured I could lower a bit on the voltage there.
I write >> I certainly would not be adjusting the NB HT Voltage at all. In the normal course of overclocking that voltage has never figured into an overclock and the what-ifs are too great to know what may happen stability wise and you sail uncharted waters, since it is about 99.9% left alone.