- Joined
- Jan 22, 2003
Oroka Sempai said:I am starting to get a feeling that I will need to use massive ammounts of water if I do a closed passive WC set-up...how about more water?
...
If there is no contact with outside air in that system, just water->plexiglass->air then it really is pointless. The more water you have the longer it will take to reach a max temp, but it will still reach the same max temp (well a little lower because a tad bit of heat energy will be dissipated into the air through the plexiglass and you have more surface area, but barely any). The only way your idea will work is a evaporative setup. You will just be making your own shower head and have a very small tower.
That review that was on overclockers.com really wasn't a good example of a passive setup. His might really work only because its an old p3 setup so he's probably dealing with very little heat, like 50w. And his setup was evaporating. Just very slowely. Im sure his tuperware thing wasnt completely air tight. And you could even see in every pic the water that had evaporated then condensed again and was dripping down the sides.
Anyways you aren't going to get too much help with your:
frame of mind.I still really want to have it look cool. That is the main thing that is getting in the way right now. I want to do watercooling, but not a car rad or something, I want it to look cool...
Lots of people come in here with the "bling" mode on and throw reason right out the window. Most people here look for performance and recommend solutions that revolve around performance. Not center pieces.
If your really want your idea to work, read up on evaporative cooling. You want the smallest droplets you can make, the most droplets, and you want those droplets to have the largest possible "hang time."
If you want other ideas heres what I'm doing. Basically the same thing as the others with large car radiators. Im just using a baseboard pipe