Passmark, lol. That's part of the problem.
I don't know why it would say that. Again, by all specifications it is SLOWER than a i9-10900K. It's dual core boost is 100 MHz less than 10900K. Look at both processors at the Intel Ark and see what I am saying.
https://ark.intel.com/content/www/u...0900f-processor-20m-cache-up-to-5-20-ghz.html
https://ark.intel.com/content/www/u...0900k-processor-20m-cache-up-to-5-30-ghz.html
https://www.anandtech.com/show/15785/the-intel-comet-lake-review-skylake-we-go-again
View attachment 211388
Maybe overclocked as it is likely a better bin since it is 65W? But that said, isn't it locked (CPU multiplier) anyway?
EDIT: You added more to your post after I posted, lol...please just make another post so nothing gets missed.
I don't know why it would say that. Again, by all specifications it is SLOWER than a i9-10900K. It's dual core boost is 100 MHz less than 10900K. Look at both processors at the Intel Ark and see what I am saying.
https://ark.intel.com/content/www/u...0900f-processor-20m-cache-up-to-5-20-ghz.html
https://ark.intel.com/content/www/u...0900k-processor-20m-cache-up-to-5-30-ghz.html
https://www.anandtech.com/show/15785/the-intel-comet-lake-review-skylake-we-go-again
View attachment 211388
Maybe overclocked as it is likely a better bin since it is 65W? But that said, isn't it locked (CPU multiplier) anyway?
EDIT: You added more to your post after I posted, lol...please just make another post so nothing gets missed.
Let's see it..... so far... nada.That's the kind of heat load the thermosyphon removes.
Last edited: