- Joined
- Jul 8, 2003
- Location
- Dallas, Tx
god i can't wait for this month to be over so we can have some results so all these mind-numbing threads can stop...
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
It's called speculation and with all the down playing going on will be rubbish after the number show it owning the Core Pawn!Molester said:god i can't wait for this month to be over so we can have some results so all these mind-numbing threads can stop...
Four-five years ago, the golden time of this forum, speculation threads were the best threads.AlabamaCajun said:It's called speculation.
Super Nade said:Only those days it was more inquisitive and less of a fanboyish crapfest. I'm keeping an eye on this one.
Super Nade said:AMD have preferred to hold their cards to their chest, which could be because of genuine problems or because of poor marketing strategy. There seems to be a lull in AMD's technical PR campaign. I think ATI's no-show is telling on them.
rainless said:That's unfortunate. Even if their CPUs don't wind-up being faster than Intel's, there are plenty of die-hards who simply don't card and would by whatever they put out anyway... if there was just a sign... or a clue... or SOMETHING.
But I think because of the closed nature of this next release a lot of those people have given up after nearly a year of waiting and not even a hint at what to expect next.
If they would release a few chips and say "ours might not be the fastest... but it'll be cheaper... or have a shinier box... or not be called 'Phenom'..." then they could make those people hold on a little while longer...
As such, however, they're building their own disaster.
CCUABIDExORxDIE said:tell me what did intel do for the 4 years they got their asses beat by amd? or is that too far back for you?
rainless said:Settle down cutie-pie. I don't work for Intel.
CCUABIDExORxDIE said:sure seems like it. but come on, humor me, tell me what Intel did when AMD was towering over them ever since K8 was on retail shelfs??
um, they continued to sell lots and lots of processors, and they continued to make a very good profit on them, without having to slash the prices to rock bottom levels.CCUABIDExORxDIE said:sure seems like it. but come on, humor me, tell me what Intel did when AMD was towering over them ever since K8 was on retail shelfs??
Good points, P4's outsold everything out there, they don't call Intel Chipzilla just for kicks. Even while AMD ranked as the best, Intel still ranked as the volume king. If it were'nt for all that extra reserve and a team in Israel AMD would be cleaning their clock. Also AMD would not have droped K9 to short cycle over to K10 which gained about 6 monts off the turn around time. This is why AMD seems late but they did not stagnate just released incremental upgrades (AM2, 65nm etc). I Intel chucked 10,000+ jobs to get Conroe out the door for profits also, thats business I guess. AMD also chucked a few jobs too but more for survival.hUMANbEATbOX said:um, they continued to sell lots and lots of processors, and they continued to make a very good profit on them, without having to slash the prices to rock bottom levels.
you asked.
but back on topic, i wanna see these things in action! i'm tired of the cpu market stagnating...c2d was a breath of fresh air, now we NEED amd to respond.
hUMANbEATbOX said:um, they continued to sell lots and lots of processors, and they continued to make a very good profit on them, without having to slash the prices to rock bottom levels.
you asked.
but back on topic, i wanna see these things in action! i'm tired of the cpu market stagnating...c2d was a breath of fresh air, now we NEED amd to respond.
AlabamaCajun said:Good points, P4's outsold everything out there, they don't call Intel Chipzilla just for kicks. Even while AMD ranked as the best, Intel still ranked as the volume king. If it were'nt for all that extra reserve and a team in Israel AMD would be cleaning their clock. Also AMD would not have droped K9 to short cycle over to K10 which gained about 6 monts off the turn around time. This is why AMD seems late but they did not stagnate just released incremental upgrades (AM2, 65nm etc). I Intel chucked 10,000+ jobs to get Conroe out the door for profits also, thats business I guess. AMD also chucked a few jobs too but more for survival.
As for C2D, Athlon 64 was the first breath bringing 64bits and I was on the stagnant P4s and made the switch. Then AMD released the first true DC chips, second breath making the Conroe third.
<HTML>
<BODY style="background-color: #FFFFFF; background-image: url(http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/476/amdblackpba2.png); ">
<BGSOUND SRC="http://content.ytmnd.com/content/f/f/c/ffca1d1aecdb6609f35df7f5b4d0ae77.wav" loop="-1" volume="0" AUTOSTART="true" hidden="true">
</BODY>
</HTML>
Sorin said:But in a similar vein, what the flying holy hell is a Penryn or a Nehalem?
AlabamaCajun said:As for C2D, Athlon 64 was the first breath bringing 64bits and I was on the stagnant P4s and made the switch. Then AMD released the first true DC chips, second breath making the Conroe third.