Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
hitechjb1 said:These two links from AMD quote the thermal power spec of the SanDiego 3700+, 4000+ as 89 W (but they may have new spec with slightly reduced power for Opteron ?).
http://www.amdcompare.com/us-en/desktop/details.aspx?opn=ADA4000DAA5BN
http://www.amdcompare.com/us-en/desktop/details.aspx?opn=ADA3700DAA5BN
The Opteron 152 and 154 are similar in terms of frequency, core, revision, to the FX-55 and FX-57 respectively which are rated 104 W in thermal power.
http://www.amdcompare.com/us-en/desktop/details.aspx?opn=ADAFX55DAA5BN
http://www.amdcompare.com/us-en/desktop/details.aspx?opn=ADAFX57DAA5BN
Yea... like this error on AMDCompare showing X2s have voltages of 1.35V to 1.40V. In fact, they have 1.30V to 1.35V. There are much more mistakes on this web... not to mention that many chips are missing.c627627 said:His sources were AMD documents.
Yet another example of how poorly AMD PR, marketing and overall information distribution is run?
OPN tables - public of NDA versions. For PowerNow! steps, you need Thermal Data Sheets that are, however, harder to get.c627627 said:Here's a logical question: what do they use for reference?
I mean if you work for AMD in any capacity, and you need to look up a specification, what do you use?
Public versions contain already released CPUs. NDA versions contain already released CPUs + already released CPUs for specific partners (do you remember 3400+ s939 chip?) + CPUs that will be available in few months.c627627 said:I meant for CPUs that have already been released, not future CPUs with details that are covered with NDAs...
Are they also filled with mistakes?
If not why aren't they publicly available?
It'll be a looong wait for that 45% price drop of dual cores you're waiting forEspElement said:i may get a dual core when they hit 200ish...