- Joined
- Dec 16, 2007
- Location
- Chicago, IL
Not to mention Nvidia boards have a 50-100$ premium on them over other similiar X48 boards. But as long as their GPU's are the best, people will still buy their boards.
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Not to mention Nvidia boards have a 50-100$ premium on them over other similiar X48 boards. But as long as their GPU's are the best, people will still buy their boards.
To be honest, I'd trade 10% performance loss for stability any day. So long as a 4870X2 is significantly faster than a 9800GX2 (+30%) I'm going for it, couldn't care less about the GT200, not expecting performance from Nvidia's new chip to be fantastic for some reason.
well whats more important than overclocking room? I mean the 4xxx series will be cheaper than nvidia's flagship, why not have the overclocking advantage, and become the diamond in the rough.
Not to mention Nvidia boards have a 50-100$ premium on them over other similiar X48 boards. But as long as their GPU's are the best, people will still buy their boards.
can anyone PROVE a 256bitybus is a limiting factor? i would love to see the tests and why people are so upset a 512 isnt in it, the 38 line didnt need a 512 to beat out the 29 series did it...
Remember, overclockers are a barely noticeble market share for ATI day to day sales.. you think they would take "out of the box performence sales" vs "overclockers sales", how many people who will buy these cards do yuou think overclock vs the amount who dont even know what overclocking is and got the card in their latest dell system
if it werent for overclocking i wouldn't be getting laid...overclockin has brought me tons of love from the females... =)
can anyone PROVE a 256bitybus is a limiting factor? i would love to see the tests and why people are so upset a 512 isnt in it, the 38 line didnt need a 512 to beat out the 29 series did it...
and how did ATI let anyone down they never said themselves they would use, or even need a 512bit
then i could see if they did use a 512, people would then complain about price being so high...
Remember, overclockers are a barely noticeble market share for ATI day to day sales.. you think they would take "out of the box performence sales" vs "overclockers sales", how many people who will buy these cards do yuou think overclock vs the amount who dont even know what overclocking is and got the card in their latest dell system
not to mention other things like corrupting data, killing ram sticks and other issues with the "i" lines.
"Oh Chrome your processors so fast and powerful" lol just had to throw it in there.
While it would be awesome if true I will wait for some real reviews.
They probably ran the 9800 with full AA/AF and then the 4870 ran neither LOL
I want to know if it drops to its knee's at high resolution with lots of AA like ATI's current lineup
The benchmark is fake. It is impossible for a 3Gz CPU to achieve such a score. Remember 2 of the 3DMark06 tests are CPU tests.
He is just trolling, and knows that since this is in the ATI section, people will stick up for his 'misguided' point of view since ATI cards lose a bunch of performance with AA enabled at higher resolutions.. Sigh.. With they would do away with the segregation in the GPU sections
what are you talking about bro? everyone knows the 3870x2 is a great bencher what makes u think the 4800z wont be better??? another
-1 for nvidia fan boys
-1 for nvidia fan boys
no trolling my dood heres another link
donotclick.http://www.technewstime.com/hardware-news/amd-4870-roumoured-to-beat-nvidia-9800gx2"]http://www.technewstime.com/hardware-news/amd-4870-roumoured-to-beat-nvidia-9800gx2
"Oh Chrome your processors so fast and powerful" lol just had to throw it in there.
jokers_greg,
Better than HD3870X2?