• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

Real non-stupid overclocking questions

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

c627627

c(n*199780) Senior Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2002
1. Why is it a better idea to shoot for [higher] FSB x [lower] multiplier to get the same MHz?

2. What damages RAM more: higher voltage or setting Memory settings in BIOS to aggressive instead of optimal?

3. If a mobo has a PCI lock protecting PCI and video cards, what about IDE drives, are they protected more with [lower] FSB x [higher] multiplier, or the other way around?

EDIT: More specific questions:

4. Is there any downside to
[higher] FSB x [lower] multiplier
over
[lower] FSB x [higher] multiplier to get the same MHz?

Particularily if the FSB is in the 200 range.

5. Do you ALWAYS have to 'load optimal settings' after updating BIOS (which resets your specific previous settings)?

Reasons for asking:

166 FSB x 13 multiplier = 2166MHz and bootup display of Athlon XP 2700+
[higher] FSB x [lower] multiplier = 2166MHz and bootup display of Athlon XP 2600+
Higher MHz are not displayed as PR ratings at bootup, but as MHz

2. Would like to extend hardware lifetime despite how quickly these things get obsolete.

3. If you’re lucky to own an nForce2 with PCI lock (Epox, Abit, Asus, Chaintech), your PCI cards are protected from negative effects of overclocking but what about other components?


THANK YOU VERY MUCH

HERE'S A SUMMARY OF THREAD ANSWERS TO REAL NON-STUPID OVERCLOCKING QUESTIONS:




1. Why is it a better idea to shoot for [higher] FSB x [lower] multiplier to get the same MHz?

Higher FSB gives you better all around performance because RAM is working faster. Higher FSB is almost always more beneficial than higher pure MHz. I don't know at what point it would negate the difference, but higher FSB means far, far greater performance. Increased memory bandwidth means that you relieve some of the bottlenecking happening between the components. There are no negative effects to doing this unless you have to volt mod your board to get it to run at 200 or so.


2. Setting Memory settings in BIOS to aggressive instead of optimal should not damage your RAM. Very high voltage will.


3. If a mobo has a PCI lock protecting PCI and video cards, what about IDE drives?

The IDE controller built into a motherboard operates off of the PCI bus, and when the bus is locked down, then the IDE controller is still running in spec. Hard drives are typically designed to run on a 33mhz PCI bus, and sometimes when they run too far off that they begin to stop functioning as they should. PCI locks prevent this. As for the rest of your components, your PCI cards and AGP card will still be running in spec too. You can't tell without special instruments if there is a PCI lock. Google search engine or discussion boards are the only way to find out if there's documented evidence if your mobo is PCI locked (good) or not (not as good). Unfortunately, most are not.


4. Is there any downside to
[higher] FSB x [lower] multiplier
over
[lower] FSB x [higher] multiplier to get the same MHz?

Not if your mobo has a PCI lock. However, if your mobo doesn't have a PCI lock that means that too high of an FSB may take your hard drive and PCI cards too far out of specs.

Think of the FSB as a hose of varying diameter. Think of the CPU as a firemen with buckets waiting to put out a fire. Think of the water as the data need to put out that fire. The fatter the hose, the sooner they get the water. How many men you have waiting with buckets could be thought of in terms of multiplier, sort of. Essentially, your processor can outwork everything else in your system, and frequently waits for data to crunch. With a higher FSB, it gets the data sooner (and can send it sooner, too) so overall system performance increases.

Example: It's better to have an increase of 7 FSB and end up with resulting FSB X multiplier of 20 MHz less.


5. Do you ALWAYS have to 'load optimal settings' after updating BIOS (which resets your specific previous settings)?

Some say no. However some say that it's good to even always clear the cmos after bios flash before the first boot/post. They say in newer bios there may be some new variables which will get their values from places which weren't used before or were used for other variables...

6. Although upping voltage may affect life span of RAM, it was said that aggressive settings to RAM do not affect its life span... then how would you recommend adjusting the most widely available type of RAM, the PC2100 whose defaults are:
T(RAS) 6
T(RCD) 3
T(RP) 3
CAS 2.5

1. Active (to) Precharge Delay (aka Tras, tRAS) - usually 5 or 6 or 7, smaller the better, (Tras >= Trcd + CAS)

2. RAS to CAS Delay (aka Trcd, tRCD) - 2 is good, 3 is OK

3. RAS Precharge Delay (aka Trp, tRP, Precharge to Active) - 2 is good, 3 is OK

4. CAS Latency (aka CAS) - use 2 whenever possible

5. Cmd Rate (some bios does not have this, set automatically) - 1T is better than 2T


CAS Latency is most important for memory bandwidth, or for bursting a large block/page of data like in 3D, video, gaming applications.
Set it to 2 whenever possible.

2nd important is the RAS to CAS Delay (Trcd).
It is the number of cycles between the row and column access. 2 is good, but 3 is OK.

The Precharge Delay (Trp) is the precharge time after an active access. 2 is good, but 3 is OK.

Active to Precharge Delay (Tras) is the minimum time for an active access
(to perform a single row and column access).
It is the least importance for memory performance. Usually 5 or 6 or 7 is fine. Tras >= Trcd + CAS


The difference between running GOOD memory at the most agressive timings ( which it CAN do ) vs avg memory at moderate timings ( which is the BEST it can do ) is about 5-7% in 3D Mark.


7. Quality heatsink and fan and high rated RAM are essential for overclocking but so are power supply voltages. If line voltages go 5% lower then rated lines, this may be a sign that you need a better PSU.

Also if you ever wonder why not to spend more on a better heatsink&fan instead of case fans:
The reason is because to have a truely effective cooling system you need to add BOTH a better heatsink AND better case cooling. If you just get a better heatsink and no extra case fans you case will just get hotter and hotter untill even with your good heatsink your CPU is still overheating.


8. To test the stability of the overclocked system:
Use Prime95 for CPU and RAM stability tests (Prime95 Options > Torture Test)
http://www.mersenne.org/freesoft.htm

SiSoftware Sandra (Burn-in)
http://www.sisoftware.co.uk/

3dMark with all the tests including DirectX testing features for Direct Draw and Direct3D
http://www.futuremark.com/download/

________________

2100+ AIUHB 0248
[206] FSB x 11 = 2266 MHz (2800+)
at 1.75 V @ 37(min) C to 46(max) C
Epox 8RDA+
Thermalright SK-7 with variable speed 80x25mm YS-Tech FD1281259B-2F
2x 256MB Kingston (Hynix chip) PC2100 7 3 3 3 @ 6 3 3 2.5
GeForce4 Ti4200 ; Antec SX-835II case ; Antec SmartPower SL350


EDIT: increasing to 1.8 V resulted in 6 2 2 2 stable
and [208] x 11 = 2288 MHz @ 37 to 46 C

EDIT2: But that's only because Memory Frequency was not changed from Auto to 100%, which it always should be because regardless of benchmark scores, real life performance is best with 100% insync instead of Auto:
[152] FSB x 15 = 2280 MHz @ 1.8 Vcore with memory frequency at 100% [152] @ 2.77 Vdimm


EDIT3: To test the stability of overclocked CPU, download the latest bug fixed version of Prime95:
http://www.mersenne.org/freesoft.htm

Double click on PRIME95.EXE to start the program.

Just Stress Testing (if prompted) > OK >
Options > Torture Test > Blend (if prompted) > OK


The program should not give any errors.
It may be necessary to run the program 12-24 hours to make sure an overclocked system is stable (no program errors displayed).


If you get errors only after several hours, this is a result of slight instability because the system is running with little or no margin. It's stable enough to boot and to be moderately stressed, but as soon as the system is under enough load to go over that critical point, it will freeze. To be 100% stable, Prime95 should run 12-24 hours without any errors.

The point of testing is to see if you get errors or not thus testing the stability. The meaning of errors themselves is not as important.


Running Prime95 Torture Test for 5 to 30 minutes is enough to get a feeling about general stability. If it seems to be stable, increase the FSB (with 0.025V Vcore increase if needed), or increase the multiplier by 0.5.

Reboot and run Prime95 Torture Test for 5 to 30 minutes and repeat this until the Program displays errors.
It's then time to back down and repeat the Torture Test until there are no errors for at least 12 hours.

It's OK to use the computer while Prime95 Torture Test is running in the background.


After finding your stable point you may want to then retest by going to the Advanced section, setting the password to 9876 and then setting Priority to 10. (You won't be able to use your computer while Priority 10 Prime95 Torture Test is running, but it'll confirm your system stability.)

Use 3DMark to test video card stability.


EDIT: Average stick overclocks:
PC2100s OC from 133 to high 140s or low 150s FSB 100% insync.
PC2700s OC from 166 to high 180s or low 190s FSB 100% insync
PC3200 usually way into 200s, depending on brand. There are PC3000 sticks that are excellent overclockers too.
 
Last edited:
1 Higher fsb gives you better all around preformance ram is working faster is the reason you get better preformance.

2 voltage

3 If a board has pci lock that means that the pci slots are locked @ 33 mhz no matter what fsb I think.
 
Yes as far as I know and i'am not sure if it's locked up to 333 fsb or form 1- 250 .
 
the nforce2 mobos are locked, or at least the big named ones are, like epox and asus, *most* of the others are as well. and yes, if the pci frequency is locked it also protects hdds and roms. nforce1 mobos did not have a pci lock that i know of
 
"... if you’re lucky to own an nForce2 with PCI lock (Epox, Abit, Asus, Chaintech)"
Leadtek and MSI do not have a PCI lock.

Here's a specific question:
Is there any downside to
[higher] FSB x [lower] multiplier
over
[lower] FSB x [higher] multiplier to get the same MHz?

Particularily if the FSB is in the 200 range.

and another one:

Do you ALWAYS have to 'load optimal settings' after updating BIOS (which resets your specific previous settings)?
 
Last edited:
I couldn't think of any downside when it comes to using a higher fsb instead of a higher multiplie. Higher x's seem to use more volts also higher fsb gives you a better preformance.
 
c627627 said:
1. Why is it a better idea to shoot for [higher] FSB x [lower] multiplier to get the same MHz?

2. What damages RAM more: higher voltage or setting Memory settings in BIOS to aggressive instead of optimal?

3. If a mobo has a PCI lock protecting PCI and video cards, what about IDE drives, are they protected more with [lower] FSB x [higher] multiplier, or the other way around?

EDIT: More specific questions:

4. Is there any downside to
[higher] FSB x [lower] multiplier
over
[lower] FSB x [higher] multiplier to get the same MHz?

Particularily if the FSB is in the 200 range.

5. Do you ALWAYS have to 'load optimal settings' after updating BIOS (which resets your specific previous settings)?

1. Higher FSB is almost always more beneficial than higher pure MHZ. I don't know at what point it would negate the difference, but higher FSB means far, far greater performance. Increased memory bandwidth means that you relieve some of the bottlenecking happening between the components. There are no negative effects to doing this unless you have to volt mod your board to get it to run at 200 or so.

2. Higher voltage *may* damage RAM, aggressive settings will not. Most people do not put their voltage over 2.9, while others are willing to go above that. I leave mine around 2.7 simply because bumping it makes no difference in what kind of overclock I can get. However, there is a difference between 2.5 and 2.7, both of which are generally within good quality RAM's tolerances, and your mileage will vary with your RAM's voltage. Whether or not these voltages are within warranty is dependent on your RAM.

3. The IDE controller built into a motherboard operates off of the PCI bus, and when the bus is locked down, then the IDE controller is still running in spec. Hard drives are typically designed to run on a 33mhz PCI bus, and sometimes when they run too far off that they begin to stop functioning as they should. PCI locks prevent this. As for the rest of your components, your PCI cards and AGP card will still be running in spec too.

Finally, why would you want to load optimal settings? I've never done it before... maybe I'm just out of the loop.
 
Think of the FSB as a hose of varying diameter.

Think of the CPU as a bunch of men with buckets waiting to put out a fire. (complete a task)

Think of the water as the data need to put out that fire. (complete a task.)

The fatter the hose, the sooner they get the water. How many men you have waiting with buckets could be thought of in terms of multiplier, sort of. (It's not an EXACT analogy, but it's close.)

Essentially, your processor can outwork everything else in your system, and frequently waits for data to crunch. With a higher FSB, it gets the data sooner (and can send it sooner, too) so overall system performance increases.
 
Thank you very much for really insightful and educational answers.

Althouh upping voltage may affect life span of RAM, it was said that aggressive settings to RAM do not affect its life span... then how would you recommend adjusting the most widely available type of RAM, the PC2100 whose defaults are:
T(RAS) 6
T(RCD) 3
T(RP) 3
CAS 2.5
 
Last edited:
All ram\motherboards react different to different ram timing setting.

Example A stick of pc2100 might could run 5 2 2 2.0 on one board @ 140 while on another board the same ram with the same timing might could hit 145 or 150.

Ram timing is kinda fishy you really do have to find out what works best for you ram\mobo combo.
 
All-right sir. The idea is to take each of the 6 3 3 2.5 settings down a notch then. Would you recommend any particular order this should be done in?
 
I would try 6 3 3 2.0 if that works then try 5 3 3 2.0 then 5 2 2 2.0.

Thats what I suggest.

Or just try 5 2 2 2.0 right of hand.
 
RAM settings jump when you get into low FSB 200s
from 6 3 3 2.5 to 7 3 3 3

Are people in danger of damaging their RAM if they try 5 2 2 2 from 7 3 3 3?

__________________
2100+ AIUHB 0248 @ 206 x 11 = 2266 MHz (2800+)
1.75 V @ 36 to 42 C
Epox 8RDA+
Thermalright SK-7 with variable speed 80x25mm YS-Tech FD1281259B-2F
2x 256MB Kingston (Hynix chip) PC2100 7 3 3 3 @ 6 3 3 2.5
 
Last edited:
Supertrucker said:
the nforce2 mobos are locked, or at least the big named ones are, like epox and asus, *most* of the others are as well. and yes, if the pci frequency is locked it also protects hdds and roms. nforce1 mobos did not have a pci lock that i know of


How would one actually confirm or check their board to find out if it's locked? Assuming that you're not attempting to o/c yet.

iz
 
Good question. For quite a bit in the beginning there was confusion whether even Epox had it. You can't tell without special instruments so that's why it was unclear untill someone finally found documented Epox confirmation of a PCI lock.

Hit google or discussion boards to find out if your mobo is PCI locked (good) or not (not as good). Unfortunately, most are not.
 
Last edited:
I dont know how your gonna OC your FSB with DDR 2100 CAS 2.5. That's not very good ram at all for OCing. Chances are that IF you run a high FSB you wil have to slow your memory timings to "normal" which will negate some of the advatage of OCing the FSB.

If U have 150 Bucks try Corsair XMS DDR 2700 or 3200. It will run at the fastest memory timings at virtually any FSB speed.
 
c627627 said:
5. Do you ALWAYS have to 'load optimal settings' after updating BIOS (which resets your specific previous settings)?

It's not enough. It's good to always clear the cmos after bios flash before the first boot/post.

In newer bios there may be some new variables which will get their values from places which weren't used before or were used for other variables. So you may not be able to post. Or you could fry something (if some voltage hsa new place) although not likely.
It is possible though that it can damage the bios flash... so you would need to find a way to make a hot flash of the bios on other mb...

I haven't always cleared the cmos and haven't had any problems. Once couldn't boot and had to clear it and then it posted.
 
Samoyed said:
I dont know how your gonna OC your FSB with DDR 2100 CAS 2.5. If U have 150 Bucks try Corsair XMS DDR 2700 or 3200. It will run at the fastest memory timings at virtually any FSB speed.

Excellent question, please follow up.
Now if 2x 256MB Kingston (Hynix chip) PC2100 6 3 3 2.5 gets this (rock stable Prime95 and 3DMark and Sandra) out of 2100+ AIUHB 0248:

[206] FSB x 11 = 2266 MHz
or
[199] FSB x 11.5 = 2288 MHz
at
1.75 V @ 36(min) to 42(max) C


1. Is increase of 7 FSB better than extra 20 MHz?
2. So far I have one reason to justify spending $150 on better RAM: extra 100MHz or so. However, I suspect there is a downside to using PC2100 even if you can get over 206 FSB out of it, what is it?

Keep in mind that today FIC-AU11 mobo, (almost exact replica of Epox 8RDA+ nForce2) costs $89 and 2100+ T-Bred B costs $87.
$150 on RAM is therefore a tough sell for those in financial crunch.

_______________
2100+ AIUHB 0248
[206] FSB x 11 = 2266 MHz (2800+)
at 1.75 V @ 36(min) to 42(max) C
Epox 8RDA+
Thermalright SK-7 with variable speed 80x25mm YS-Tech FD1281259B-2F
2x 256MB Kingston (Hynix chip) PC2100 7 3 3 3 @ 6 3 3 2.5
GeForce4 Ti4200
Antec SX-835II case
Antec SmartPower SL350
 
Last edited:
1 Yes fsb increase is by far better the mhz depending own how much. (7 fsb v 20mhz= 7 fsb wins)

2 As for the replica board of the 8rda the 8rda is about 88 bux and your not getting a raw deal in my opinion. So why would you want to pay more for a cheapier built board?
 
Back