Card comparison test – Kyle Lunau
I had been in the market for a new graphics card for several months when the PNY Nvidia Geforce 6800 GS AGP popped up for about $200 (CAD) on Tigerdirect, so I threw caution to the wind and grabbed it while it was cheap.
I first had concerns about the PNY brand, but considering they have a 3-year warranty, I figured it couldn’t be too bad. But I started to wonder would my Athlon XP 2500+ and 512 MB of RAM hinder my new graphics card? Would it give me the huge performance gains I was looking for? Or would it just show that my system was in need of other new hardware?
With all these questions in my head, I figured I would do everyone a favour and find out if a new graphics card is worthwhile if you have an older machine as I do.
So the day the card arrived, I had to hold back my urge to put it in the computer and first benchmarked my old card (an Asus V9570 TD a.k.a. Geforce FX 5700 256 MB). Then the new card was inserted and benched. And finally, the max playable settings on several good and/or graphically demanding games and demos before and after the new card was installed. So on to the interesting part!
The system used for this test was as follows:
- Asus A7N8X motherboard
- AMD Athlon XP 2500+ at stock clocks and voltages
- 512 MB of Kingston Value RAM, DDR 400 3-3-3-8 operating @ DDR 333
- Maxtor 40GB 7200 rpm drive
- Western Digital 160GB 7200 rpm drive
- Video Cards: Asus Nvidia FX 5700 256 MB vs PNY Nvidia 6800 GS AGP
Test Settings:
- 3Dmark 2001 SE was run on highest settings and 1280 x 1024 resolution
- 3Dmark 2003 was run with 1024 x 768 x 32 resolution and optimal settings (the non pro versions settings are not changeable)
- 3Dmark 2005 was run with the same settings as 3Dmark 2003 for the same reason
- Aquamark 3 was run with 1024 x 768 x 32 on very high detail with no AA and 4x Aniso
- Pcmark was run with the system tests only
Benchmark | Asus Nvidia FX 5700 256 MB | PNY Nvidia 6800 GS AGP |
3Dmark 2001 SE | 4,819 | 12,619 |
3Dmark 2003 | 2,760 | 9,256 |
3Dmark 2005 | 614 | 4,250 |
Aquamark 3 | 23,440 | 45,713 |
PCMark 04 | 2,927 | 3,060 |
Battlefield 2 Max Playable Settings | Resolution: 1280×960 Terrain: Medium Effects: Medium Geometry: Low Texture: Medium Lighting: Low Dynamic Shadows: Low Dynamic Light: Low AA: Off Texture Filtering: Low View Distance: 100% | Resolution: 1280×960 Terrain: High Effects: High Geometry: Medium Texture: High Lighting: Medium Dynamic Shadows: High Dynamic Light: High AA: Off Texture Filtering: High View Distance: 100% |
GTA: San Andreas Max Playable Settings | Resolution: 1280x1024x32 Quality: Low Anti aliasing: off Draw Distance: Maximum | Resolution: 1280x1024x32 Quality: Very High Anti aliasing: Level 3 Draw Distance: Maximum |
Star Wars Empire at War Demo Max Playable Settings | Resolution: 1280×1024 All Details: Medium/low AA: Off Soft Shadows: Off Bloom: Off Heat Distortion: Off | Resolution: 1280×1024 All Details: Max AA: Max Soft Shadows: On Bloom: On Heat Distortion: On |
Tribes: Vengeance Max Playable Settings | Resolution: 1280×1024 Detail Level: Medium Bump Map Detail: Low/off Texture detail: Medium Terrain Macro Texture: On Fluid surface detail: Med. Fogging Distance: Ultra-Hi Dynamic Shadows: Med. Glow Detail: Medium Terrain Deco Layers: Off World Detail: Medium V 2.0 pixel shaders: Off | Resolution: 1280×1024 Detail Level: Ultra-High Bump Map Detail: Ultra-hi Texture detail: Ultra-high Terrain Marco Texture: On Fluid Surface detail: Ultra-h Fogging Distance: Ultra-Hi Dynamic Shadows: Ultra-hi Glow Detail: Ultra-High Terrain Deco Layers: On World Detail: Ultra-High V 2.0 pixel shaders: On |
Lord of the Rings: Battle for Middle Earth 2 Demo Max Playable Settings | Resolution: 1280×960 Model Detail: Low Animation Detail: Very Low VFX Detail: Very Low Shadows: Off Terrain Detail: Low Water Detail: Low Texture Quality: Low Shader Detail: Low Decal Detail: Off | Resolution: 1280×960 Model Detail: High Animation Detail: High VFX Detail: High Shadows: High Terrain Detail: High Water Detail: High Texture Quality: High Shader Detail: High Decal Detail: High |
Empire Earth 2 Max Playable Settings | Resolution: 1280x1024x32 Model detail: Low Animation detail: Low Texture detail: Low Effects detail: Low Weather detail: Low Water detail: Low Terrain detail: Low Shadow detail: Off Enable PIP: On Battlefield Ambients: On Show Blood: On | Resolution: 1280x1024x32 Model detail: High Animation detail: High Texture detail: High Effects detail: Extreme Weather detail: Medium Water detail: High Terrain detail: High Shadow Detail: High Enable PIP: On Battlefield Ambients: On Show Blood: On |
Half Life 2 Demo Max Playable Settings | Model Detail: Medium Texture detail: Medium Shader Detail: High Water Detail: reflect world Shadow Detail: High Colour Correction: Disabled AA: None Filtering: Trilinear HDR: Bloom | Model Detail: High Texture detail: High Shader Detail: High Water Detail: reflect all Shadow Detail: High Colour Correction: enabled AA: 2x Filtering: Anisotropic 16x HDR: Full |
Need For Speed Underground 2 | Resolution: 1280×960 Level of Detail: Med/Low AA: Low Filtering: Max | Resolution: 1280×960 Level of Detail: Max AA: Max Filtering: Max |
WOW! Not only did the new card allow for maximum settings in all but the most graphically demanding games but it also had another strange but very welcome effect – a significant decrease in load times. When playing EE2 on my old card, I found it would take around 15-20 seconds to load up a map; with the new card installed, this has been decreased to about 3 seconds.
All I can say is that if you have an older system as I do, then a card like this is a VERY good way to improve your gaming and system life at a reasonable cost instead of spending a thousand bucks on a new system.
It runs stable, isn’t too loud and is incredibly fast. Although a few games would have been appreciated, but for the price nothing compares. I would recommend this card to any gamer who doesn’t have the money to upgrade to PCI-E. This is one awesome video card!
Update: After downloading and running 3Dmark 06, my computer scored 1,943, only 46 marks behind someone with a 2.2 GHZ Athlon 64 and 1.5 GB of RAM, same story with a 2.8 GHZ Pentium 4 with 1 GB of RAM (same video card). Sweet! I also ran Pcmark 05 and got 2,927 marks NTB!
17 replies
Loading new replies...
Member
Moderator #666
Member
Member
Moderator #666
Member
Member
Member
Disabled
c(n*199780) Senior Member
Join the full discussion at the Overclockers Forums →