- Joined
- Dec 27, 2008
Yeah, it's crazy. I had a 965 with 1.425v VID in 2009/2010 that needed 1.55v for 3.9 GHz But CPU-NB did 3 GHz
Its like playing the lottery
Good one, Beep!
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Yeah, it's crazy. I had a 965 with 1.425v VID in 2009/2010 that needed 1.55v for 3.9 GHz But CPU-NB did 3 GHz
Its like playing the lottery
What shows in the SPD tab JEDEC columns for recommended timings may be slanted toward Intel processors and may not be quite right for AMD CPUs. Just keep that in mind.
I was lumping the XMP column together with the JEDEC columns in my thought process. And a mismatch may not be a rare event.
And I still question whether the OP has a CPU that's going to want to play in a stable fashion with a 1600 mhz ram frequency, a least with latencies that will not defeat the purpose of going there. He's tried it at 1600 mhz for a long time now and still has random instability. It just seems to me a good diagnostic step would be to run it with the ram at 1333 mhz for a while and see if the instability goes bye bye. At least then he would know whether or not it was ram frequency or ram timing problem (or a combo of both).
Also, judging from your idle speed, you still have C1E or other cool and quiet options / powersave options enabled. Go ahead and scan through the bios and disable all of those please. Its highly recommended to avoid those functions when overclocking.
"trents" since we are into thread necromancy, do you remember this short thread? http://www.overclockers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=700532. The actual XMP progamming can and very often does make adjustments to the bios that are not visible on the surface and on some boards those settings are not even available to the user for adjustment but the bios itself can be setup to run in XMP mode by the SPD of the ram. So the truth actually is that just the few settings visible in the SPD tab of CPUz is not the full deal.
Most ram when speccd for AMD boards is really done so at 2T not 1T as it is for the same ram on an Intel motherboard. However most motheboard bioses set 1T for fast AMD ram and often just the change from 1T to 2T is enough to change the way DDR1600 works on AMD boards.
Yeah, this is the general wet blanket that many denabs have been getting and you are both mistaken, because we have already found issues with his overclock unrelated to the highly mythical IMC problems.So the reality of stable versus not stable just from a change in ram speed is a truth. Give me stable as you suggest over non-stable as the OP seems to run into when he tries for DDR1600 on an older IMC. There is often a possiblity to overclock ram and there is the possiblity to run DDR1600 where it was not working previously by making adjustments to bios but the XMP profile when in actual use may well be setting up the bios in a manner the user cannot even do manually. So I watch the XMP as displayed in CPUz as it is not extensive enough to tell the entire story. Sorry "trents" I just was jogging them air old brain cells for you. I have to do mine at least 3 times a week these days.
RGone...ster.
Thanks, I think we were making good progress there before the thread got sidelined.Get 'R Done.
. . . The real truth is he doesn't want a wetblanket response. He wants his ram to run stable at 1600 and considering his ram voltage is way off we are starting there god forbid we have to go ahead and make some manual adjustments to the RAM timings, right? I mean, its just the end of the world when you have to go that far.
And I agree with FlailBoy that it is not good to change a lot of stuff at the same time when you are encountering instability. That is why I am suggesting putting the ram back at 1333 mhz to eliminate ram frequency being too high as a possible cause of instability. That I know of, OP hasn't established stability with basic settings like that.