Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Not unless you plan to be using it for the next 10-15 years. With the slight voltage increase we are using (1.4v and under) and as long as the chip is staying relatively cool (under 75-80C under load, which likely is a very small amount of time) I woudn't worry about it, especially as a person [myself] who upgrades every year and a half to 2 years.
What about taking things to the next level. With the Voltage still on auto, I'm getting 4500 at 1.32V and running perfectly stable. Temps under full load on Prime95 hover in the 60s occasionally going into the 70s with a Zalman 120mm set at around 1300 RPM (~50%)
I started playing around with trying to crank it a bit past 4500 and am having no luck. First tried with the voltage on auto and got a crash very quickly into starting Prime 95. Temps hadn't even started rising that much.
I then tried manually cranking the Voltage up to just barely over 1.4 just as a starting spot with a plan to dial it down from there once it worked. Same result.
What else do I need to be fiddling with to find out how much juice I can squeeze from this rock? Seems strange that I'm able to get good stability and low voltage (on auto, no less) at 4500 but can't get to 4600 with a significant increase in voltage.
What am I missing?
I am overclocking my Mushkin 1333 to 1600 which was perfectly stable at 4500, but maybe I should just go with the stock 1333 while I play with going up above 45?
Im not certain I understand what this means... do you mean if a CPU reaches 4.5ghz that it can clock further? It really doesnt work that way. All chips have a limit, but the 2500k is 5Ghz+ in most cases...and like I said, never seen 4.5Ghz as the limit (so long as temps are under control of course). But if thats what you meant, naa, just b/c I get to XX doesnt mean I will get to XX +1. I mean if I get to 5.4Ghz am I going to get 5.5Ghz? The story changes both at teh high and low end of the story.is it common of processors that WILL take 4500 to overclock even further?
If thats his chips limit, it has to be the lowest clocked 2500k Ive seen ever. There is more in the tank, we just dont know how to get there at the moment.
Im not certain I understand what this means... do you mean if a CPU reaches 4.5ghz that it can clock further? It really doesnt work that way. All chips have a limit, but the 2500k is 5Ghz+ in most cases...and like I said, never seen 4.5Ghz as the limit (so long as temps are under control of course). But if thats what you meant, naa, just b/c I get to XX doesnt mean I will get to XX +1. I mean if I get to 5.4Ghz am I going to get 5.5Ghz? The story changes both at teh high and low end of the story.
I will be finally be able to bring my Gigabyte Z68 UD3H mobo, the i5 2500K, and the Crucial 8GB 1333 back and get them replaced with probably the same components today.
Hopefully the computer will work normally this time..
Is there a good 4.0GHz OC guide for Intel Sandy Bridge i5(i3-i7) CPU's? I would like to try OC next time, but not quite 4.5GHz yet..
I will be finally be able to bring my Gigabyte Z68 UD3H mobo, the i5 2500K, and the Crucial 8GB 1333 back and get them replaced with probably the same components today.
Hopefully the computer will work normally this time..
Is there a good 4.0GHz OC guide for Intel Sandy Bridge i5(i3-i7) CPU's? I would like to try OC next time, but not quite 4.5GHz yet..
4.5 is really remarkable easy (once you figure out to Disable the turbo). Getting above 4.5 took a bit more work, but I see little reason not to jump right to 4.5
Just started a thread for this question...
http://www.overclockers.com/forums/showthread.php?p=7060086#post7060086
EDIT: Sorry about the double post.