- Joined
- Dec 21, 2011
- Location
- Nerwport,NC
LoL real AMD guys plz,I smell a challenge
-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Can't get ram up to speed
- Thread starter Draven25
- Start date
There are 22 subs in all of HWB on AMD's with 2400 ram clocks or better. ONLY 22. Did I say something wrong?
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2011
- Location
- Nerwport,NC
yes real AMD guys
Sorry, but a man's got to know his limitations.
2400 speed ram on AMD is unrealistic. A good AMD guy knows that going in.
That's my opinion. Sorry if you don't agree.
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2011
- Location
- Nerwport,NC
so your limitations is 1866 lol one love brother
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2011
- Location
- Nerwport,NC
not trolling you brother maybe your team mates
you got nothihg to bring to the table
you got nothihg to bring to the table
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2004
- Location
- JAX, Mississauna
Almost like back in the old days ain't it mR. sCOTT? No helpful information just somelthing that makes you have to ask are you being trolled. Odd you don't even have benching as your trademark and yet you know how many AMD HWBot submissions show with DDR3-2400 ram or greater.
This post of his is what I could not make sense of:
QuickFast says >>
not trolling you brother maybe your team mates
you got to bring to the table
On two lines like that.
Now I can read that as > not trolling you brother and put a period for punctuation at the end of that phrase and he is not trolling you man.
Then I have to read >> maybe your team mates and put a period there for punctuation and then it reads. I am not trolling you man but I might be trolling your team mates. You got any team mates mR. sCOTT?
Maybe if it were like this >I am not trolling you brother; maybe your team mates, that you got to bring to the table. Get your team mates to the table for what?
So I don't know. Often I can read, writing. Sometimes I can even write something that is readable. Then there are times I seem unable to either read or write. I never know just how I will show up. Not sure how it is for today yet.
RGone...ster.
Made me lol.
BTW, what position is your team in again?........oh yeah, below mine.
Don't worry, I'll save you a place at the table.
Peaceful co-existence is a good thing.
There is no fanboyism here. I run both manufacturers.
Sorry for the OT posts. I'll leave now.
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2011
- Location
- Nerwport,NC
AND vs INTEL? mr bones knows what i am talking about
- Thread Starter
- #153
I had posted before that I don't care that I would have to slow my clock and speed down. I was reluctant but I will. That's if some one has a good suggestion on timings like I asked before. If not screw it I won't oc and the timings I have now for 2400 just ran blend again for 2.75 hours and had no workers drop.
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2009
Don't worry about that Draven ....... here in the AMD section you are not the first person to come in looking to run their equipment at such and such speed. we deal with it every day, usually its with motherboards and can get a little tiring at times.
In the end it is your equipment run it as you like, if you need help there is always someone here that can help you till you decide that's enough or someone to tell you when going farther is not worth pushing your equipment. For the most part you will always get fair advice from the regulars anyways.
As I said before , 1866 is standard memory controller clock for AMD nowadays. Since memory controller has its limitations, no matter how you set memory , it won't show any special performance improvement. In this case you set 1866-2133 memory clock but try to tighten memory timings and push CPU-NB to the max ( usually 2500-2800 depends from CPU ).
I was able to run memory up to 3100 on AMD/FX but I couldn't make it 100% stable @2400+. System was randomly crashing ( mainly in games ) even though, memory could pass 5h+ stability tests.
Actually there is no point to try to set 2400+ memory clock on any platform which isn't using IGP ... and FX series are not using IGP.
For benching you can set 2800+ to get slightly better results but even then it won't help much just because of that limited memory controller in FX CPUs.
I was able to run memory up to 3100 on AMD/FX but I couldn't make it 100% stable @2400+. System was randomly crashing ( mainly in games ) even though, memory could pass 5h+ stability tests.
Actually there is no point to try to set 2400+ memory clock on any platform which isn't using IGP ... and FX series are not using IGP.
For benching you can set 2800+ to get slightly better results but even then it won't help much just because of that limited memory controller in FX CPUs.
- Thread Starter
- #156
And as I said, I understand now that when I bought these I was mislead into believing that the components I bought could reliably run 5ghz with ram at 2,400mhz. I have accepted this and am willing to move on to just archiving a 5 or 5.1 ghz oc with ram below what I was HOPING would be a sweet match. And with such does anyone have a suggestion to timings and voltages to active this. Btw I agree and can see that 2400 is actually worse than even 1333 as BF4 sucks now horribly at 2400.
TridentX 2400 should work stable at:
1600 7-8-8-24 ~1.60V
1800/1866 8-9-9-24 ~1.60-1.65V
2000 ~9-10-10-24 ~1.60-1.65V
2133 9-11-11-28 ~1.60-1.65V
Most of above settings will give you performance similar to 2400 10-12-12.
You can run memory benchmarks like AIDA64 to compare settings and pick which one performs best.
Believe me, I'm also not happy that I can't run memory stable @2400 on AMD. Recently I got A8 6600K and no matter what I do it's crashing with memory @2400. Too much depends from memory controller.
1600 7-8-8-24 ~1.60V
1800/1866 8-9-9-24 ~1.60-1.65V
2000 ~9-10-10-24 ~1.60-1.65V
2133 9-11-11-28 ~1.60-1.65V
Most of above settings will give you performance similar to 2400 10-12-12.
You can run memory benchmarks like AIDA64 to compare settings and pick which one performs best.
Believe me, I'm also not happy that I can't run memory stable @2400 on AMD. Recently I got A8 6600K and no matter what I do it's crashing with memory @2400. Too much depends from memory controller.
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2012
Thought OP had 2400mhz on the first page.
I'm not an admin, but I'd lock this thread because OP may start feeling some great he doesn't need.....
I'm not an admin, but I'd lock this thread because OP may start feeling some great he doesn't need.....
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2012
In other words, our was hard to read the last couple of pages of this one.
- Thread Starter
- #160
Tried 8-9-9-25 at 1.65. 2 workers dropped after 10mins in blend. Thinking 9-9-9-25 at 1.65
Similar threads
