- Joined
- Jan 8, 2004
I'm waiting for the July 22nd price drops and was wondering which would be better suited for me? I mostly game on my computer, but I also do some photoshopping here and there, and plan on getting into audio editing. I figured having 4 cores as opposed to two would be better right? Well that's what I thought until I read these:
So I was going to go for the Q6600 when the prices drop...but now I'm rethinking things. So are these guys correct? Should I just go with the E6600 (if what they are saying is true about the Q6600)? Also...do you guys think the Core 2 Duos will drop in price as well come July 22nd? Since the quads will basicly be around the price the duos are currently.
"Cons: horrible performance gain over the E6600, bottle neck of cpu bandwidth, bad planning, not worth the $
Other Thoughts: Intel caused a bottle neck with this when they doubled the cores and didnt bump up the bus speed. E6600 gives 533Mhz per core, the Q6600 only gives 266Mhz or 333Mhz depending on if you are runnign a 1066Mhz FSB or 1333Mhz FSB. The gain from this is definately not worth the cost even after the price drop will happen. Definately dont get this. Wait for the true quads or get the E6600."
"Cons: Intel pretty much just put two dual-cores in the same package. not really a True quad in my opinion. Its almost like having two dual-cores on one motherboard. you wont get the best results until the put the cores all on one die.
Other Thoughts: Well, Its a good start. but they should have done better. AMD is due to come out with a true Quad (all on one die) and that should show us the true quad capabilities. We will see."
So I was going to go for the Q6600 when the prices drop...but now I'm rethinking things. So are these guys correct? Should I just go with the E6600 (if what they are saying is true about the Q6600)? Also...do you guys think the Core 2 Duos will drop in price as well come July 22nd? Since the quads will basicly be around the price the duos are currently.