• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

Request for Help 4.6 on FX8350

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.
Okay you said it was 'dry reading' about LLC setting. Probably so since it is a setting and not a performance tweak. Most show more hoopla about performance. Hehehe.

Back in late 2011 I believe it was and the Bulldozers just out for a while, there was a Bios Overclocking Guide for CHV and BD FX-8150 that was posted at the Asus ROG site. It was done by an old friend of mine, so I know 'how' he thinks.

Part of what was posted in that ROG BOG for CHV was this group of statements.
CPU Load Line Calibration: The “Regular” option sets a margin between the user set voltage and the actual voltage to ensure that the real-time voltage level does not breach (overshoot) the set VID by longer than AMD specifications.
Medium and High, set a tighter margin between the idle and full load voltage, so that idle voltage does not need to be ramped excessively to meet full-load voltage requirements when the processor is overclocked.

Ultra-High and Extreme may over-volt past what you’ve set in BIOS in an attempt to ensure that the voltage does not sag below the applied voltage for a long duration (when the VRM is faced with a heavy load). Auto is currently configured to default to Extreme LLC, so it’s an idea to set Medium or High manually if you do not want any visible over-voltage.

We prefer to use the Medium setting for most overclocking as it seems to compliment the transient response of the VRM (Vdroop on the Medium setting is around 0.05V on the current BIOSes).

CPU & CPU/NB Voltage Mode: Manual Mode allows us to set a “static” value for CPU and CPU/NB voltage respectively. Offset mode, allows us to offset the base voltage by either subtracting or adding voltage to the base value.
CPU Manual Voltage: Adjust as necessary to facilitate overclocking/underclocking.

Cool N Quiet must be enabled for CPU Offset voltage to function.


Now that very last underlined statement is one I had to remember since most of the time we say to disable CNQ when trying to get TO stabllity.

Since we know the Sabertooth is almost the same 'beast' as the CHV boards, it stands to reason that the description of CPU_LLC setup for CHV would be pretty darn accurate for the beastlly Sabertooth.

So I have that bit of CPU_LLC info copied and saved so I can refer to it, when or if I forget what is recommended from someone that had access to the engineers at Asus.
RGone...ster.

EDIT:
Note that part about what AUTO was set to and the statement says "currently configured to", that means the bios writers could make a change in what AUTO does. Not sure if they have even after all this time...but they could.
END EDIT.
 
Last edited:
Most of the stuff I found online made for pretty dry reading but this gives a not too technical overview for anybody interested:

That was a good find, the graphs lay it out real good.
 
I had this txt file saved on another computer...went got it.

.
Okay this is a long read. I suggest you copy it where you can print it out. It is a combination of things I wrote nearly a year ago and some of what "johan45" said in a thread when we were both tying to help a user go to using "offset vcore". I have tried to gather as much information as possible and some things are redundant and said from a slightly different angle to try and get the point across.

In the long run, there was NO shortcut to getting my offset Vcore setup just right. Took some serious trial and error. Fact is when I wrote the first description over a year ago...I had not even tried to setup and use offset Vcore. Then a few months later I tried to and GAVE UP....then a few more months go by and I give it a GO again and now it is the "only" way I would run Vcore. Live and learn.

Okay, I said it is long.
Felt a little better tonght so let my fingers onto the Keyboard.

Okay one thing I need to say first so that I do not forget.
1. > Offset Vcore does not appear to work well without Cool N Quiet enabled. I likely also would leave C1E enabled. Not sure about the new APM (Application Program Management For FX processor).TurboCore can be off. And down the way will speak to Windows power maangement mode.

2, > CPU VID is a voltage programmed into the cpu to tell the Bios what to use as default voltage to the cpu.

3. > It is my understanding that CPU VID can/could/might change with the load. Not sure on AMD cpus since there is not nearly as much info about the AMD cpus as there is for Intel.

4. > This is what Asus intends for CPU_LLC to do. At least on the CHV where the greater amount of information was available.
CPU Load Line Calibration: The “Regular” option sets a margin between the user set voltage and the actual voltage to ensure that the real-time voltage level does not breach (overshoot) the set VID by longer than AMD specifications.

Medium and High, set a tighter margin between the idle and full load voltage, so that idle voltage does not need to be ramped excessively to meet full-load voltage requirements when the processor is overclocked.

Ultra-High and Extreme may over-volt past what you’ve set in BIOS in an attempt to ensure that the voltage does not sag below the applied voltage for a long duration (when the VRM is faced with a heavy load). Auto is currently configured to default to Extreme LLC, so it’s an idea to set Medium or High manually if you do not want any visible over-voltage.

We prefer to use the Medium setting for most overclocking as it seems to compliment the transient response of the VRM (Vdroop on the Medium setting is around 0.05V on the current BIOSes). << Note that about current bioses. I would read that to mean the Vdroop amount may change with bios version. << My note.

What I have said openly in the forums is that I prefer setting my Vcore manually and choosing an LLC mode that maintains MY manual Vcore setting loaded or unloaded, then I am not guessing. Old school I suppose.

There is another way perhaps. I have not done this because of statement above.

Might need to add another note here. Denebs/THUBANS have far fewer P-States than the later FX processors since the FX processors have multiple speed TurboCore. Each of those Pstates to my understanding can call for a greater CPU VID setting or in effect that base VID needed to operate the cpu. This known it should be far easier to use Offset Vcore on Denebs than on the FX processors. FYI.

Now for setting Offset Vcore as I best understand it.
1. Manually set Vcore to the voltage that will pass P95 Blend mode for the length of time you wish P95 to run without failure. Do so with only Medium or High LLC setting.

2. Use CoreTemp to find the VID of your processor. There are other ways but more involved. CoreTemp gives the CPU_VID of the installed processor.

3. Alright we know what the CPU_VID of the processor is now. We know what we set the Vcore manually to pass P95 Blend for the desired length of time. So > #4.

4. Subtract the CPU_VID from the Manual Vcore we had to use to pass P95 and that result should be the number you would use as + XXXX setting in Offset mode. Maintain the Medium or High mode of CPU_LLC since that is what was tested with using manual setting.

5. So now what happens? Well when you put Win 7 in "Balanced" power mode and you are doing nothing on the computer at all but maybe a little surfing, the Balanced mode setting will drop the cpu speed back to the PerCentage of WideOpen speed that you have chosen in Win 7 power mode settings. I use 15% and not the default 5% of max cpu speed at idle type loads. Continuing, I will have a slow cpu speed setting and Cool N Quiet will have dropped the Vcore down to the CPU-VID and will NOT have applied the OFFSET Voltage which comes on as Load is Raised on the cpu. Now we have a more energy efficient system that is not always running wide open speeds and voltages and always outputting heat.

6. There are no telling how many posts I have read off and on about Offset Vcore. I have tried to take some of those, all over the map posts, and cut them down to the essentials in how it should all work.

7. I do not for a second believe there will not have to a little tweaking done to the process as described. I don't know of anything that ever seems to just work.

Just a couple of more thoughts for clarity. I wrote this based on my CHV motherboard. How its' LLC is made to work. Obviously there are Asus boards that do not have those levels of CPU_LLC. That in itself would make for 'adjusting'.

I also know exactly what my CPU_LLC will do at each level. I have tested it as some have as well. Therefore if one has X CPU_VID (from CoreTemp) and his subtracted result from #4 above is as an example is 0.1250, I could instead of using 0.1250 as my + Offset Vcore number; I could use 0.1350 or close as possible and be sure of sufficient Vcore at Wide Open cpu speed at full load using the same CPU_LLC as in #4 above.

Vdroop is instituted by the Cpu manufactures to keep the VRM rise in Vcore from damaging processors. LLC was instituted to try and keep the Vcore closer to the setting in bios without allowing possibly damaging rises in Vcore but maintaining enough Vcore to pull the load on the processor. So if I use Offset Vcore and a medium CPU_LLC, it may well be possible to get even a little better than the best of both worlds.

One more time, I think I will state that getting the hang of the principle maybe easier on Deneb processors since they do not have so many Pstates that may influence the CPU_VID. Of course with me and my board and cpu...well nothing for it but to have to deal with FX-8350 and my CHV when I get back on it. Maybe this will give those who tinker and have the skills, an idea to see what happens. About it as I see it.
RGone..

EDIT:
I always have had Cool N Quiet enabled on my CHV board. I use the Balanced mode in Win7 power manager to drop my Cpu speed from 4.4Ghz and 4.8Ghz to approx 1600Mhz. So having Cool N Quiet enabled does not mess up MY overclock. When I post in the forum I move Win7 to performnce mode so the throttle down is not seen in Screen Captures.
END EDIT. .

Something Else:
What's the difference between offset voltage mode and enabling CnQ?
1. CnQ is an AMD designed method of lowering the multiplier and lowering the cpu voltage when load is not great. Vcore drop is pre-designed into the cpu by AMD.

2. Offset Vcore is a user chosen method of ADDING Vcore to the cpu by an amount the user chooses to use when the cpu goes under load. Take the load away and the Vcore "loses" the offset chosen amount but there is no dropping of the multiplier.

3. Turbocore is monitoring load/temp and can UP the multiplier and move to a chosen AMD programmed voltage when Turbocore senses that 1/2 but not all cores can have their speed raised.

4. Now throw in Windows power manager that can set "no load" cpu to a % of cpu computing power when not loaded and can utilize cpu power by a % amount up to 100% when loaded when in "balanced mode".

5. So the FX processor of today has TurboCore trying to raise the speed of some cores by upping the multiplier and Vcore by a set amount. BUT CnQ is looking to see what is the load and intends to reduce all the multipliers and Vcore by a set amount. Windows is also looking at the load and in balanced mode can reduce the cpu power output by dropping the cpu by a % amount that lightly translates to reduced multiplier and possibly the Vcore but when coupled with use of the Offset Vcore settng mode, the Vcore is dropped when the load is reduced.

6. You get all those things that seem to be arm-wrestling each other for control of what the cpu gets to do? The arm-wrestling power/performance/speed managers is why we don't try to 'teach' offset vcore setting in a forum by typing text into a forum post.

I run C6 and TurboCore Disabled. C6 is required for TurboCore to function.

I run Offest Vore mode with the resulting voltage enough to supply the Vcore needed to run my FX-8350 at 4.8Ghz P95 Stable. This Vcore includes accurate setting of CPU_LLC.

I run C1E enabled and Windows power manager set to balanced mode with the settings for balanced mode set to a low of 15% and the high to 100%.

The result of this balancing act is that when my cpu goes under load the cpu leaves 1400Mhz and moves up to 4800Mhz with enough Vcore adjusted with CPU_LLC to run the 4800Mhz P95 Blend mode for 2 hours.

Trying to teach this to many forum goers is too dang complicated most of the time. On the surface it seems complicated and most don't seem to get it because it takes some trial and error and recording of results at "their" end. Mostly they want gimme A and B so I can get C and go back to gaming. So we suggest turning off all the Green Stuff to allow for overclocking since removing all the Green Stuff from the setup, makes for easier overclocking for the masses of gimme A and B and get me to C.

Using my setup I get ~1400Mhz when not in heavy use and when needed the cpu can ramp up to a stable 4.8Ghz and last I checked my system would sleep and then wake-up with a push of my power button.

I have written about the Offset Vcore mode setting inside a thread in the AMD mobo forum section and once here in the CPU forum section in response to and with "johan45". Not sure which actual threads those were but I did do some how to setup offset Vcore explaining.

RGone...ster.
 
You want short version without any variables or 'why's'....

Short version.
Prime95 Blend mode for at least 2 hours, the setting you can run daily. Use HWMonitor to 'see' the
Vcore being used with the CPU_LLC you are using. Note that Vcore. I use Max shown in HWMonitor.

Use Core Temp to find the CPUVID.

Subtract the CPUVDID from the Max Vcore found in P95 Blend testing as shown by HWMonitor.

The result of the subtraction above is the amount of plus (+) voltage you put into offset Vcore.

C1E and Cool n Quiet enabled. C6 and TurboCore Disabled. I run APM disabled.

Windows Power Management set to Balanced Mode.

Short Version. Should work for any model of mobo and brand.
RGone...
 
Absolute magic!

Fully stable on offset at 4.5 and idling at 1400 / 0.94 volts.:ty:

A big thankyou to everybody who has held my hand through this and patiently explained the ropes and to RGone and his detailed explanations and notes:salute:

Will try and skinny down the LLC to medium (mostly because I can't leave anything alone for more than 5 minutes) but in the meantime ...

Party Time!:attn:

 
Some boards will 'skinny' down and some just will not. If you have nO big overshoot when you start P95 Blend as evidenced by a big Max Vcore in HWMoitor but running at a good bit less...then you would be okay where you are.

Glad it sorted out.
RGone...
 
Hi All, Working it up now using the offset route thanks to all the help here. Now at 4.6ghz fully stable 2 hours P95 blend on 'high' LLC.

Was trying to find a vcore that would work with the high llc using the 'manual' vcore setting. Kept upping vcore and got to the point where it was getting silly and seemed to be doing more harm than good.

Finally thought 's*d this!' put in an offset which roughly matched what HWMon has reported as max under the (failed) test anyway, set NB LLC to 'auto' (make sure it doesn't say 1.4 - it seems to have a nasty habit of doing this!) and set CPU VDDA to 'auto'.

Ran the test in the offset mode expecting it to fail again and ... it passed! Not only that but the vcore it appears to be 'actually using' under load is lower! Attached is 2 hours into P95 blend.

ps ambient is 20c in here. Didn't open the windows for this one!

If it helps anyone, I think the following helped me:

CPU Power Response Control: Ultra Fast
CPU/NB Power Response Control: Ultra Fast

Going to try pushing upwards a bit now ...

ps I am using 1.325 as the VID for my offset which is what it shows under Coretemp under full load with c6 and turboboost disabled for both stock and OC'd states. Hope helps if anybody is getting as frustrated as I was.

All the best.
 

Attachments

  • 4.6offset1.png
    4.6offset1.png
    23.2 KB · Views: 225
  • 4.6offset2.png
    4.6offset2.png
    24.8 KB · Views: 227
Honestly after going to offset Vcore mode...I can tweak the Voltage to the cpu much better and more finely than setting manual cpu voltage. Something about the offset Add that just works better for me.
RGone...
 
Honestly after going to offset Vcore mode...I can tweak the Voltage to the cpu much better and more finely than setting manual cpu voltage. Something about the offset Add that just works better for me.
RGone...
Like twocents said I don't have much luck with the manual Vcore mode either. I thought that using manual mode the value that was set in bios would be the value that you would see the cpu using when prime was running. But I still see hwmonitor current Vcore changing as it goes & that value sometimes lower than what is set in bios.
 
@papadan, I am not too surprised that you see some voltage fluctuation with the 6+2 VRM of the EvO board with FX-8350. I just am not sure that 6+2 is strong enough to stay spot on with the 8 core. But you have been using the rig for sometime now without real issues so likely it is close enough for an area like 4.5Ghz or so.

And to be just plain honest, I have a bud who has had just about indentical systems to my own and his stuff does not act but about 85% like mine. Heck they build each board on an assembly line with robots picking he parts from a bin of what are supposed to be the same parts for each model of mobo. Yet they vary a great deal. H*ll if they build cell phones with that much variance...I don't see how you could even call the correct phone number. Must be something missing from my knowledge base. HEhehe.

You seem fine though in day to day. Adjust it a little this way and log the changes. Try it from another perspective and log the changes. Crap it took me a good 20 hours total over a couple of weeks to get my own rig to 'just' the place I wanted it. At least with a good AMD board with all be buttons, we can get mighty darn close to spot on.
RGone...
 
@papadan, I am not too surprised that you see some voltage fluctuation with the 6+2 VRM of the EvO board with FX-8350. I just am not sure that 6+2 is strong enough to stay spot on with the 8 core. But you have been using the rig for sometime now without real issues so likely it is close enough for an area like 4.5Ghz or so.

I'm not too worried about it. Just going to keep using the offset mode & go for it.
Dan
 
Hi papadan, I don't think this is an exact science - more like a trial and error balancing act between bios vcore and llc. Bit of a guessing game as far as I can make out as who really knows what 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% are actually doing anyway:-/

I hit lucky with my 4.6 offset settings above. Well pleased - it still isn't 'perfect' but the best I can get it. The vcore shown in hwmon switches between 1.404 and 1.416 under load and hwmon shows a max of 1.428 which is presumably when the load disappears and that is with 8+2 power.

I take the view that occasionally touching 1.428v for a second or so before dropping back to sub 1v at idle is probably better for it than teh way I had it set up for manual. It was idling constantly at 1.416v and couldn't even GET stable at high llc without ridiculous vcore - well into the yellow anyway.

This offset way seems to be more efficient and take less vcore. Even so, I tried both lowering the offset for that llc and lowering the llc for that offset (all else equal) to see if I could do any better and it failed pretty quickly so I guess that is just where it is happy at the moment.

I don't think it is possible to get a really accurate measurement for what the vcore actually is without a multimeter. The monitoring software only updates once a second anyway so I wouldn't sweat it too much. Looks like you are doing great so far. Good skills.
 
Last edited:
I take the view that occasionally touching 1.428v for a second or so before dropping back to sub 1v at idle is probably better for it than teh way I had it set up for manual. It was idling constantly at 1.416v and couldn't even GET stable at high llc without ridiculous vcore - well into the yellow anyway.

I agree all the way. I've given up on the manual mode. As you said idling back on a 24/7 basis has got to be better for the sys. in the long run.

Sounds like you have it right where it wants to be for 4.6Ghz. Looking good!! Are you planning on taking it higher?
Dan
 
Hi Papadan, Yeah I will be working it up slowly now that I have a couple of scraps of paper with all the settings that work written down and stored in a safe place! My offset for 4.6 is already at +.10625 and the temps are starting to limit me a bit so I'll be taking it gradually. Might start experimenting with mixing in a bit of bus speed etc. I run it 24/7 at 4.5 offset which seems fine and I use the 4.6 offset profile when gaming. I have another cheeky profile set up at 4.7 too. Not fully P95 blend stable but stable enough for OCCT and gaming! How you getting along?
 
Looking good guys, the offset is the way to go for 24/7 and you're spot on with your assessment of LLC, it really depends on the board.
 
Hi Papadan, Yeah I will be working it up slowly now that I have a couple of scraps of paper with all the settings that work written down and stored in a safe place! My offset for 4.6 is already at +.10625 and the temps are starting to limit me a bit so I'll be taking it gradually. Might start experimenting with mixing in a bit of bus speed etc. I run it 24/7 at 4.5 offset which seems fine and I use the 4.6 offset profile when gaming. I have another cheeky profile set up at 4.7 too. Not fully P95 blend stable but stable enough for OCCT and gaming! How you getting along?
Sounds like you & I are running pretty much together on what we have. I have settled on 4.61Ghz for 24/7. my offset here is .07500 but when I get up over 4.725 my offset is right there with yours. Still working on stability at that freq. but temps. outside today are in the high 70s. I have been using a combination of multiplier & FSB (for 4.61Ghz I have 22x209) I haven't used anything over 22 multiplier. lots of luck & let us know how you're doing.
Dan
 
Last edited:
Back