- Joined
- Jul 20, 2006
- Location
- houston | tx
i finally got the nerve to lap my cpu and the recently discussed, modified zalman 9500.
read on for the results ...
i dug the initial zalman9500 fan mod ...
that mod alone took 9 degrees off my load temps and let me easily hit 3.5ghz with my E6400 ... but i wanted to see an average of mid fifties at load instead of the 60 to 61 i was getting before.
here's a shot of the recently modd'd zalman ... on the chance you didn't see the earlier thread:
...
...
here's a shot of it powered up and running:
...
...
so, after visiting with a friend at a body shop (scored sand paper for free! as well as some 3000micron compound) ... i set up shop at home and did the deed.
it was a bit nerve wracking, but after a few hours i had a good mirror finish on both the cpu and the heatsink.
next, i reassembled and began some tests...
the following results were obtained while testing at a continuous 24 degrees celcius ambient temperature.
idle temp obtained after 20 minutes total inactivity.
load temp obtained from one hour dualprime95 torture test (in-place FFT's).
Core2 E6400 2.13ghz @ 3.5ghz
here's the numbers:
---------------------------------------------
** BEFORE LAPPING **
---------------------------------------------
CPU idle: 42
CPU load: 60
MB idle: 31
MB load: 35
---------------------------------------------
** AFTER LAPPING **
---------------------------------------------
CPU idle: 40
CPU load: 55
pretty cheap 5 degree drop.
i'm not going to post a bunch of pics ... but i will post one or two.
first ... the one thing i'd suggest you do is take your time and have some of these handy:
yay.
second ...
my camera sucks and so all of the heat sink and CPU really-shiney-mirror-like-surface images turned out slightly blurred; i did manage to get one that looked almost okay:
the cpu actually had a little better shine/reflection than the heatsink but the images all sucked cause my camera was too close.
the cpu was tricky ... although, much easier to slide across the sand paper; the heatsink was a pain ... tended to want to stutter around and hang on the paper.
when if first started sanding the chip, i could see it was quite concave ... took some time before the grit started hitting the middle areas of the CPU surface ... after about 30 minutes ... i had all the concave removed.
all in all ... was terribly fun.
read on for the results ...
i dug the initial zalman9500 fan mod ...
that mod alone took 9 degrees off my load temps and let me easily hit 3.5ghz with my E6400 ... but i wanted to see an average of mid fifties at load instead of the 60 to 61 i was getting before.
here's a shot of the recently modd'd zalman ... on the chance you didn't see the earlier thread:
...
...
here's a shot of it powered up and running:
...
...
so, after visiting with a friend at a body shop (scored sand paper for free! as well as some 3000micron compound) ... i set up shop at home and did the deed.
it was a bit nerve wracking, but after a few hours i had a good mirror finish on both the cpu and the heatsink.
next, i reassembled and began some tests...
the following results were obtained while testing at a continuous 24 degrees celcius ambient temperature.
idle temp obtained after 20 minutes total inactivity.
load temp obtained from one hour dualprime95 torture test (in-place FFT's).
Core2 E6400 2.13ghz @ 3.5ghz
here's the numbers:
---------------------------------------------
** BEFORE LAPPING **
---------------------------------------------
CPU idle: 42
CPU load: 60
MB idle: 31
MB load: 35
---------------------------------------------
** AFTER LAPPING **
---------------------------------------------
CPU idle: 40
CPU load: 55
pretty cheap 5 degree drop.
i'm not going to post a bunch of pics ... but i will post one or two.
first ... the one thing i'd suggest you do is take your time and have some of these handy:
yay.
second ...
my camera sucks and so all of the heat sink and CPU really-shiney-mirror-like-surface images turned out slightly blurred; i did manage to get one that looked almost okay:
the cpu actually had a little better shine/reflection than the heatsink but the images all sucked cause my camera was too close.
the cpu was tricky ... although, much easier to slide across the sand paper; the heatsink was a pain ... tended to want to stutter around and hang on the paper.
when if first started sanding the chip, i could see it was quite concave ... took some time before the grit started hitting the middle areas of the CPU surface ... after about 30 minutes ... i had all the concave removed.
all in all ... was terribly fun.
Last edited: