• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

FEATURED Marathon Season IX February: 3DMark 11 Performance

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

MaddMutt

Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2015
Ohh interesting, another 3090 banger! This one has been on my list to check out for a while now. There are three benchmark GUI versions, and they all do different things to the score. I know the 1.0.1 is the high-scoring physics version, but potentially low GT scores. I think the safest option is 1.0.179 but if someone is willing to put in the time testing the different bench editions it might be worth it...

It looks like if you are using extreme cooling, then 10900K (no-microcode hax bios) will be the best move due to GT scaling from high CPU clocks. However, if you are on ambient cooling then 5950X is the best bet with W7 and no SMT. The crazy part is 5950x on AIO scores about the same as 6.8G 10900K LN2, lol, but Intel wins in that case with huge GT gains.

And yea...the wallpaper is awesome!

I've run the bench with a GTX-780Ti, GTX-960 & GTX-980. I have ran Version 1.0.1, 1.0.132, 1.0.179, and 1.0.3. The score for the Graphic's and Physic and test stayed within ~ .1% of each other. The scores where also within a close range. Here are the scores for the GTX-780Ti:
Version -- Score
1.0.1 -- 17174
1.0.132 - 17261
1.0.179 - 16953
1.0.3 -- 17198
I did notice that Version 1.0.1 & 1.0.132 Could run the GPU ~ 20-40 MHz faster without crashing. I can upload the screen shots from my testing of the GTX-780Ti & GTX-980 to another location as that would be 8 pictures. I don't think this would be the proper place to submit them :)
I'm currently testing my GTX-960 4GB and will submit them here :)
 

JLK03F150

What have I done! Member
Joined
May 17, 2005
Location
Georgia
Johan, doesn't the "MaddMutt/GTX-780Ti SLI/AIR+AIO/18521" score need to be moved down to the DUAL section?
 

MaddMutt

Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2015
I'm testing my AMD/ATI cards.. I hope for a better day as I reinstalled the HSF on 2 HD-5870's & 2 HD-5850's and they where busted :-( The 2 5850's where XFX's Black Edition so they are missed. I know I killed the VRM on 1 of them and ?? on the other. :facepalm:

MaddMutt/HD-5850 CF/AIR/7886

No .jpg or .png is allowed to be uploaded for submission :-( ???
 

spiritedandy

Premium Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2003
Location
Middlesbrough
I'm testing my AMD/ATI cards.. I hope for a better day as I reinstalled the HSF on 2 HD-5870's & 2 HD-5850's and they where busted :-( The 2 5850's where XFX's Black Edition so they are missed. I know I killed the VRM on 1 of them and ?? on the other. :facepalm:

MaddMutt/HD-5850 CF/AIR/7886


No .jpg or .png is allowed to be uploaded for submission :-( ???

Spiritedandy / GTX 1080Ti / Water /27873

im same cant upload file tried jpeg and png re-saved and lowered file size to 1.20mb then 560kbs still cant post pic will keep trying ..ill keep pic as proof :(

Spiritedandy / GTX 1080Ti / Water /27873

says not a valid image file :(
 
Last edited:
OP
Johan45

Johan45

Benching Team Leader Super Moderator
Joined
Dec 19, 2012
Johan45/ RX 6900 XT/ Air/ 43052


43052 6900.JPG
 
Last edited:

bassnut

Premium Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Sorry Guys found a bit of time tonight, passed my bedtime so this will have to do. The waterblock did what I hoped it would do no more hotspots on the 6900XT I can place my hand anywhere on the card and it is cool.

bassnut / 6900XT / H2O / 44244

Per_run1.png
 

MaddMutt

Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2015
I know this is too late - BUT - Can we include the FULL screen shot of the bench. I mean where it shows test 1, 2 ,3 ,4, PT and CB - so that we can see if the bench scales with more CPU/GPU cores/cards. This would show if ED's 18c/18t chip was scoring better than my 8c/16t or AMD's chip's did better. I bring this up because I show a 8-15 FPS difference in the PT test from using more memory. Going from 4.5 GB to 8.0 GB was ~ 9.0 FPS (lower memory allowed tighter timings) and giving full 16 GB add another ~ 6-7 FPS.

This would be for next month of course :)
 
Last edited: