- Joined
- Jul 5, 2004
- Location
- Santa Ana, Ca
felinusz said:Krag, great work on that air-cooling, it looks awesome
A word of advice/warning - be *VERY CAREFUL* with the VDDQ voltage. I did a bit of reading on the subject a while back; raising it too high, or at all, can totally wonk your memory. It's the voltage for input/output buffers, and affects the memory and GPU bus. It typically isn't a bottleneck, and gains from raising it will probably be small, and lifespan-shortening.
Partially right. With previous GDDR-I and GDDR-II memory running Vddq high and/or above Vdd
would ding the memory OC. With the exception of Samsung 8E's which like the Vddq a little hotter
than nominal spec (and right where ATI had it BTW) Vddq at or a bit below nominal spec worked
best in most cases.
This new Samsung GDDR-III is a different animal and likes it's Vddq run hot and above Vdd (again
exactly how ATI have the memory voltages setup stock) which is against decidedly against
Samsungs spec that Vddq should always be lower than Vdd. ATI knew what is was doing lol!
These new Sammy GDDR-III chips typically do not respond to Vdd increases without a
corresponding increase in Vddq to go along with it. Kraigs Vdd is running right at the high end
of samsungs nominal spec for it and Vddq is running .050 volts above it. Fairly soft really
considering Samsung DDR-I RA chips were often run with VDD a full 1/2 volt above nominal spec.
Note that the GDDR-III chips ran a bit cooler than say Samsung 8E chips at stock voltages but
heat dissapation went up rapidly and radically with increased memory voltages. TM's have no
place on Vmodded Samsung GDDR-III chips.
I am still playing it safe with Vcore increases here pending more data.
Viper