- Joined
- Jul 5, 2004
I've been looking to get a A64 setup for gaming and stuff like that, and my eye has been on the 3500's. In OVERALL overclockability and stuff like that, which of the two is better? The 130nm is considerably cheaper, but does the 90nm have lower temps/higher overclock? I'm thinking about doing 2.6-2.7ghz on my XP-120 if I get any of the two. If the 3500+ 130nm guaruntees a 2.6+ o/c on air, then i'll be getting that
Thanks alot guys!
EDIT: at monarch, i can get an OEM 3500+ 90nm for $315, i'm considering it alot, OEM 90nm 3500+ o/c any better/worse than retail?
EDIT2 : haha sorry again, but reading some reviews on newegg, people are hitting 2.6ghz with the 3200+ model, on monarch they're $216...would this be a much better deal? I'd truthfully rather pay $220 for 2.5ghz than $320 for 2.6ghz
Thanks alot guys!
EDIT: at monarch, i can get an OEM 3500+ 90nm for $315, i'm considering it alot, OEM 90nm 3500+ o/c any better/worse than retail?
EDIT2 : haha sorry again, but reading some reviews on newegg, people are hitting 2.6ghz with the 3200+ model, on monarch they're $216...would this be a much better deal? I'd truthfully rather pay $220 for 2.5ghz than $320 for 2.6ghz
Last edited: