- Joined
- May 29, 2004
- Location
- South Carolina
This looks very good for AMD. I always love those anandtech reviews. Chinstrap the 9800gtx+ sli beats the 8800gt sli in 2560x1600 so it must be a cpu bound issue.
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Check the prices of NVidia's new cards. The 4870 performs at or above the GTX 260 in many, many cases, the 4870 is going to be $300 and the GTX 260 is $400. In some cases, the 4870 performs just under the $600-$650 GTX 280. The performance/dollar on that card is out of this world.
Wow ratbuddy, you're a changed man. Any more news on R700?
"The big question is how much performance GDDR5 could add to GT200 design."it's been obvious for a while that R700 would beat the 280.
"The big question is how much performance GDDR5 could add to GT200 design."
That's the part that interests me.
I'm suprised you don't think the $299 price tag of the HD 4870 is good considering it's performance, we have to pay around £175 over here in Europe. And I didn't like the Hexus review because of the limited amount of benches, I read the Anandtech review.Just finished a thorough read of the anand article. 4850 seems like the real winner in this round of the GPU wars. 4870 is nice, but I have to disagree with one thing. At the end of the article, they mention that in Nvidia pricing, the 4850 should be $250 and the 4870 should be $400. That shows a slight bias on anand's part. 4850 is priced right where is should be, slightly cheaper than 9800GTX+, and 4870 is priced where it should be: about 25% less than a 9800GX2. If the 4870 was $400, it would be competing with GX2 at the same price and get it's butt handed to it.
4850 for $190? Definitely.
4870 for $300? No thanks.
4870 at $250? We'll talk
The real shocker to me is how the 9800GX2 has actually managed to stay way out in front, only losing a couple tests to the GTX280 at 2560x1600, and is priced the same as a GTX 260. They better discontinue the thing fast if they want to sell the GTX 200 series cards at all. And update it with 55nm cores if they want to have a prayer in hell against 4870X2.
I do wish they had OCed the cards, oh well.
Conversely, what would going from a 256 bus to a 512 bus do for the ATI cards?
GDDR5 is more expensive than GDDR3 so it would seem that making that change on nVidia's side would make the cards even more expensive.
Changing Bus width is a process change that can be done relatively cheap for ATI/AMD...
I'm also wondering if their are any pcb changes.
Theirs a big increase in perfomance for supposedly only being higher binned memory chips...
I haven't gotten the chance to read all the reviews yet, but did anyone catch one that mentions the temps? I saw in many places where they said "it was too hot to touch, even at idle" but I was hoping someone caught actual temp readings?
Which seems odd to me, the cooler looks REALLY beefy with those massive heatpipes, I'm surprised it idles so high... (even my 9800GTX doesn't idle that high)
I'm suprised you don't think the $299 price tag of the HD 4870 is good considering it's performance, we have to pay around £175 over here in Europe. And I didn't like the Hexus review because of the limited amount of benches, I read the Anandtech review.