NZXT Hale90 850W PSU Tour

Ratbuddy, plenty of sites do reviews they aren't qualified to do on PSUs - we do not. Until we are qualified and have the proper testing equipment for PSUs, we are doing tours and walk throughs showing whats out there and highlighting the pertinent features. We try to reference reliable sites like jonnyguru or hardwaresecrets who have the appropriate equipment.

Our alternative is ignoring the entire PSU market. It makes more sense to do what we can now, while we have things progressing in the background so that we are more capable sometime soon. Several efforts are currently underway. Until we are ready to do reviews, we'll continue working with vendors and manufacturers as we are able and building our contacts.

Unlike other sites which claim to do PSU reviews but their testing demonstrates they aren't capable and they are clueless how to do a proper review - this article is presented for what it is - a tour.

...Or you could just bash things and look like a jerk. By the way, this site is run by volunteers - are you qualified and capable of testing PSU's? We could use the help but you haven't stepped up. I guess its a lot easier to sit back and critically armchair it than it is to actually do anything productive.

THANKS!

Reply Like

Uhh.. Nice scam, free PSU for posting up a few pictures of it? Where do I sign up?

The powers that be (and I don't mean I.M.O.G., I mean iNet) are reluctant to put money into testing equipment. Until they do, we aren't equipped to properly say "this PSU is/isn't good". We hope to have proper PSU testing kit sooner rather than later, and when we do you'll see a raft of PSU reviews where we revisit and compare PSUs we've only so far scratched the surface with.

I wont lie: we are stockpiling hardware to some extent. But it's all for future work, when we've got the kit and the experience to push out deeper and more insightful articles.

Where do you sign up? First you maintain a site (in your free time, unpaid) that has literally millions of pageviews and over half a million unique visitors per month .... :D

Seriously though, if you have constructive input and suggestions, we're all ears. Despite being a decade old, Overclockers.com in it's current form is a very young site, driven by the forum community, and we like that.

Reply Like

Hey, I've offered to do meaningful reviews, but noone gave me the go ahead to contact manufacturers for samples of interesting gear.

I'd rather see nothing on the front page than what is basically a free press release for Nzxt. I know the guys who just hook up a PSU to their DMM and run a 20% load followed by a pronouncement that "yep, it's a PSU" are a joke, but they're trying..

This is an 80 plus gold PSU, so why not at least hook it up with a kill a watt and see how much power it saves in a real rig? If we're gonna be posting more of this type of thing, investing $40 in a couple tools to at least give voltage readings and efficiency comparisons might be a good idea.

Reply Like

Hey, I've offered to do meaningful reviews, but noone gave me the go ahead to contact manufacturers for samples of interesting gear.

For a number of reasons, we are the only people authorized by iNet to contact manufacturers as Overclockers.com representatives. Frankly, with your style of posting that's just chock-full of tact evident above, I wouldn't want you to contact any even if that weren't the case.

PM one of us with an email address you would like to use for wordpress. Come up with something relevant on hardware you have and write it. Or a guide / how-to. Anything that hasn't been written that could be useful to the site's readers. We'll see how you do with that. If it's up to snuff, let us know what hardware you want and we'll see if we can get it in your hands.

Saying what I quoted is a cop-out. Prove your worth and we'll do what we can to get the hardware. Just the same as you are saying we could invest a small amount, so too could you invest a small amount in some hardware to review and build your portfolio to show us you are serious and trustworthy.

As far as hooking a DMM up to a PSU, it's pretty close to worthless. Without taxing it to the rated capacity, there is nothing meaningful to gain from doing that. Energy efficiency readings will also be difficult with a kill-a-watt. I have a good one (tested against calibrated, government equipment) and its margin of error is about +/- 2%. Considering the difference between 80 Plus Silver and 80 Plus Gold is 2% across the board, it may be difficult to come up with any meaningful conclusions there as well.

Reply Like

This is an 80 plus gold PSU, so why not at least hook it up with a kill a watt and see how much power it saves in a real rig? If we're gonna be posting more of this type of thing, investing $40 in a couple tools to at least give voltage readings and efficiency comparisons might be a good idea.

Because doing so is misleading and its a disservice to the readers. Many sites take the perspective you have on this, and they haven't done the reading necessary to understand why they are publishing inaccurate information - they don't understand, or they don't care, that they have no idea what the accuracy is of their "reviews".

This post, and the entire thread, offers some perspective:
http://www.jonnyguru.com/forums/showpost.php?p=25383&postcount=18

Sometimes it is better to do what you are able to do accurately, rather than try to do what you aren't able to do, then report on your results without having any clue how accurate they are.

Here is a more well summarized explanation:
http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/410

Taking power readings is a science, there is no way around that. Without knowing how accurate your readings are, you aren't doing science, and thereby you aren't producing anything of value - in fact, you are quite likely misleading people who may not know any better.

More than anything, we aim to avoid intentionally misleading anyone. Especially when the correct way or a better way of doing things is well understood. We operate editorially with a budget of $0. Our volunteers are already donating a wealth of time producing and editting articles. As we find creative ways to offer more, and do things the right way, that is exactly what we'll do. Until then, we can only do what is within our means and make decisions that put us in a stronger position to produce better work in the future.

Reply Like

I like getting a closer look at components, I think the correct approach has been taken, Without the proper equipment you don't claim to have insight into the unit's true performance, Yet you can find out who built the unit (which goes along way's towards figuring out the quality) And you get a good look at the unit.
Many folks are concerned about noise, Perhaps firing the units up and putting a moderate load, (Something the average user would have) and giving some feedback on the noise level under load could be a benefit.
I believe a good number of our members have a good idea of where to go to get detailed PSU reviews in regard to actual performance. I see no negative in regard to the OCer's staff putting up articles like this one. It gives us information and doesn't mislead us into believing the information is any more than what is stated.
Btw, I actually like the white!

Reply Like

Good suggestions, determining an average load gets a bit mushy but it wouldn't be hard to come up with a reasonable figure to use for that. Creating and maintaining a consistent load is a little trickier unless you have the right equipment, which is where we'd run into trouble again.

As for saying meaningful things about noise, there isn't much meaningful to say there either without the necessary testing equipment. SPCR sets the bar for saying meaningful things about noise:
http://www.silentpcreview.com/article148-page1.html
http://www.silentpcreview.com/article26-page1.html

Good sound readings demand a well controlled environment or some sort of Anechoic chamber.
http://www.silentpcreview.com/anechoic_chamber_SPCR

Granted, our community doesn't care THAT much about sound, this is Overclockers.com after all, but if we are going to say something more than "its pretty damn load" or "its fairly quiet" we'd need to consider what it takes in order to state reasonably accurate figures that are good enough to differentiate one piece of equipment from the other.

So in summary, in my opinion if you are talking numbers thats an objective statement and the results should correctly reflect what the methodology implies. We don't want to stick our head in the sand and use a methodology that implies we have no clue what we are doing. If we know better than to do it the wrong way, our continued focus should be on positioning ourselves in such a way that we can do things the right way, and doing the best we can in the meantime. :)

Reply Like