Crysis Demo Links...

[Cassius2117]

With everything turned to high I'm getting 20-25fps running in DX9 mode at 1680x1050. The end cutscene was down to less than 10fps though. Total crap.

 

[Maverick0984]

With everything turned to high I'm getting 20-25fps running in DX9 mode at 1680x1050. The end cutscene was down to less than 10fps though. Total crap.

lol

25min later double post

 

[razorseal]

here ya go:

to be honest with you, I have NO clue why the palm trees are not AA, but here are my settings from nhancer:

so there it is...

this is witht he new 169 beta drivers btw

 

[Tyranos]

The translucency is done with a different process for anti aliasing, which is only activated under "Very High" quality.

 

[razorseal]

The translucency is done with a different process for anti aliasing, which is only activated under "Very High" quality.

I could do the 'very high' trick and take some ss...

I just don't want to mess with it because i'm happy with the current settings

 

[Maverick0984]

to be honest with you, I have NO clue why the palm trees are not AA, but here are my settings from nhancer:

Am I missing something or are there no settings listed?

I see it is 1152x864 like you said. What level AA are you saying that is? Doesn't look like it is on really?

I will admit though, I haven't tried the new Beta drivers yet. Trying those when I get home from work.

http://www.ocforums.com/showthread.php?t=533209

That posts contains http://www.techspot.com/article/73-crysis-performance/ which has performance marks for the different cards. It is obvious how AA at even low values really takes its toll on the cards. I just don't think it is physically possible to achieve those framerates with High Quality and any sort of AA on . Every single review tells me otherwise. It is unfortunate for all of us.

 

[xilix]

I throw on AA and get hardly any frame drops. Dunno. Don't care. It looks awesome and that's all that matters. The tweaked ini for very high settings rocks, I highly recommend them.

 

[Goateh]

Loving the demo, can't wait for the full. Don't think i'll be trying the 'Very High' .ini tweaks though, on high my computer isn't the best for performance...

 

[Knivez]

Is anybody running this at 1920x1200? I'd really like to run at my 24" res and am curious as to the performance people are getting.

(ignore my sig)

 

[Mustanley]

I tried it at 1920x1200 and I had to sacrifice too much detail to get a decent framerate. All settings on medium and it was still too laggy for my tastes.

 

[fabulouscoops]

Is anybody running this at 1920x1200? I'd really like to run at my 24" res and am curious as to the performance people are getting.

(ignore my sig)

Yes I am running 1920x1200 all high settings no AA on a 24" widescreen.
Framerates are in the 20s but so playable you don't get any stutter at all.

6750 @4 GHz, 8800GTX stock, 2 GB RAM, Win XP

 

[stereo555]

Running 1920x1200 and get 30-45/48+ (in XP x64)

everything on high minus :
Shadow Q = med
Shader Q = med
Post Processing = med

this is with older Nvidia drivers too . Have not tried the new betas as of yet .

Btw, anyone using Vista x64 and try getting 1920x1200 to come up in the graphic settings . I can only get 1680x1250 max to show up in Vista x64 ???

 

[deathman20]

Running 1920x1200 and get 30-45/48+ (in XP x64)

everything on high minus :
Shadow Q = med
Shader Q = med
Post Processing = med

this is with older Nvidia drivers too . Have not tried the new betas as of yet .

Btw, anyone using Vista x64 and try getting 1920x1200 to come up in the graphic settings . I can only get 1680x1250 max to show up in Vista x64 ???

In 64-bit mine can see 1920x1200, but it crashes in Vista so its pretty worthless at this point for quiet a few.

 

[razorseal]

oops... sorry no clue why the settings didn't show up

I dunno meng, AA is on... hardware forced

 

[Impar]

Greetings!

Screenshots of XP DX9 High, XP DX9 Very High and Vista DX10 Very High:
http://www.yougamers.com/news/13605_dx10_possible_in_windows_xp_for_crysis/

Vista 32-bit vs. Vista 64-bit
http://www.legionhardware.com/document.php?id=698&p=7

 

[PhysX]

cool, so basically in the last set of screens they have there "geometry / POM" there is no difference between DX10 VH & DX9 tweaked.

 

[deathman20]

There seems to be a slight difference in lighting still, but as well Vista DX10 64-bit at least, is using 400Megs less memory as well.

Vista has lower FPS as well but its known with Crysis.

 

[Maverick0984]

oops... sorry no clue why the settings didn't show up

I dunno meng, AA is on... hardware forced

Can you do it inside of Crysis? I don't think nhancer is working to be quite honest .

 

[OBLIVIONLORD]

There seems to be a slight difference in lighting still, but as well Vista DX10 64-bit at least, is using 400Megs less memory as well.

Vista has lower FPS as well but its known with Crysis.

What source says that Vista is producing lower frames than XP in this game?

 

[PhysX]

apparently Ea is thinkin of having ranked servers for Crysis... that would be lame.