- Joined
- Jun 22, 2006
- Location
- Japan, California, Maryland
Hmm. I've been thinking of upgrading my Samsung 204BW (20" 1600x1200) display to a 24" LCD. A friend of mine has the Samsung 245BW and I don't find the viewing angles to be bad. Of course, that's because I'm used to my TN laptop displays and my TN 204BW. However, I don't find it to be bad primarily due to the fact that I sit directly in front of the monitor anyways.
In either case, many people on the forum said the Samsung 245BW sucks and it would be better if you got the 2407WPF-HC from Dell. However, this thread makes the 2407-HC look like crap. I don't understand.
I was wondering what the "HC" suffix meant. What changes have been made between the "HC" version and the regular WPF version? Is this display no longer a TN display? If I recall correctly the 24" WPF used the same Samsung panel as Samsung's old 244T...
Edit: CNET also says: "The only reason we can come up with not to buy it is if you desperately need 1080p over component." -- Is this true? I guess the Xbox360 only runs at 1080i, not p?
Anyways, thanks for the help. I'm trying to make a decision, but this thread scares me. I really don't want to go with the Samsung 245BW because of it's idiotic gloss frame. It wouldn't be that bad if only the "outside" of the frame (the part parallel to the LCD panel) were glossy -- but the inset of the panel bezel (the part perpendicular to the screen that surrounds the edges) is glossy too, causing a nice mirror reflection of your desktop around the border of the screen. It's very very distracting. I can't believe Samsung didn't notice this.
In either case, many people on the forum said the Samsung 245BW sucks and it would be better if you got the 2407WPF-HC from Dell. However, this thread makes the 2407-HC look like crap. I don't understand.
I was wondering what the "HC" suffix meant. What changes have been made between the "HC" version and the regular WPF version? Is this display no longer a TN display? If I recall correctly the 24" WPF used the same Samsung panel as Samsung's old 244T...
Edit: CNET also says: "The only reason we can come up with not to buy it is if you desperately need 1080p over component." -- Is this true? I guess the Xbox360 only runs at 1080i, not p?
Anyways, thanks for the help. I'm trying to make a decision, but this thread scares me. I really don't want to go with the Samsung 245BW because of it's idiotic gloss frame. It wouldn't be that bad if only the "outside" of the frame (the part parallel to the LCD panel) were glossy -- but the inset of the panel bezel (the part perpendicular to the screen that surrounds the edges) is glossy too, causing a nice mirror reflection of your desktop around the border of the screen. It's very very distracting. I can't believe Samsung didn't notice this.